Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1291
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1291
18 Aug 2023
 | 18 Aug 2023

Modelling of cup anemometry and dynamic overspeeding in average wind speed measurements

Troels Friis Pedersen and Jan-Åke Dahlberg

Abstract. Cup anemometers measure average wind speed in the atmosphere, and has been used for one and a half century by meteorologists. Within the last half century cup anemometers has been used extensively in wind energy to measure wind resources and performance of wind turbines. Meteorologists researched on cup anemometer behaviour and found dynamic overspeeding to be of an inherent and significant systematic error. The wind energy community has strong accuracy requirements for power performance measurements on wind turbines and this lead in the last two decades to new research on cup anemometer characteristics, which was taken to a new level with development of improved calibration procedures, cup anemometer calculation models and classification methods.

Research projects in wind energy demonstrated by field and wind tunnel measurements, that angular response was a significant contributor to uncertainty, and that dynamic overspeeding was a significant but less important contributor. Earlier research was mainly made on cup anemometers with hemispherical cups on long arms, and dynamic overspeeding was considered an inherent and high uncertainty on cup anemometers. Newer research on conical cups on short arms showed that zero and low overspeeding at low to medium turbulence intensities is present. Different cup anemometer calculation models were investigated in order to find derived overspeeding characteristics. The general and often used parabolic torque coefficient model show that zero overspeeding is present when the speed ratio roots of the torque coefficient curve go through the equilibrium speed ratio and zero. The two-cup drag model is a special case of the parabolic torque coefficient model, but with the second root being reciprocal to the equilibrium speed ratio. The drag model always results in a positive maximum overspeeding in the order of 1.1 times the turbulence intensity squared. A linear torque coefficient results in maximum overspeeding levels equal to the turbulence intensity squared. Torque characteristics of a cup anemometer with hemispherical cups fits slightly well to the drag model, but a cup anemometer with conical cups do not fit to neither the drag model nor the parabolic model, but better to a partial linear model, and even better to an optimized torque model. Most accurate modelling of cup anemometer characteristics is at present made with the ACCUWIND model. This model uses tabulated torque coefficient and angular response data measured in wind tunnel. The ACCUWIND model is found in IEC wind turbine power performance standards, where it is used in a classification system for estimation of operational uncertainties. For an actual comparison of two cup anemometers, with hemispherical and conical cups respectively, the influence of dynamic overspeeding was found to be relatively low compared to angular response, but for conical cups it was specifically low.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

08 Mar 2024
Modelling of cup anemometry and dynamic overspeeding in average wind speed measurements
Troels Friis Pedersen and Jan-Åke Dahlberg
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1441–1461, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1441-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1441-2024, 2024
Short summary
Troels Friis Pedersen and Jan-Åke Dahlberg

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1291', Troels Friis Pedersen, 06 Sep 2023
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1291', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Sep 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Troels Friis Pedersen, 19 Sep 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1291', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Sep 2023
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Troels Friis Pedersen, 20 Sep 2023

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1291', Troels Friis Pedersen, 06 Sep 2023
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1291', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Sep 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Troels Friis Pedersen, 19 Sep 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1291', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Sep 2023
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Troels Friis Pedersen, 20 Sep 2023

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Troels Friis Pedersen on behalf of the Authors (23 Sep 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (13 Oct 2023) by Laura Bianco
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (15 Oct 2023)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (26 Oct 2023)
ED: Publish as is (31 Oct 2023) by Laura Bianco
AR by Troels Friis Pedersen on behalf of the Authors (03 Nov 2023)  Author's response   Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

08 Mar 2024
Modelling of cup anemometry and dynamic overspeeding in average wind speed measurements
Troels Friis Pedersen and Jan-Åke Dahlberg
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1441–1461, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1441-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1441-2024, 2024
Short summary
Troels Friis Pedersen and Jan-Åke Dahlberg
Troels Friis Pedersen and Jan-Åke Dahlberg

Viewed

Total article views: 401 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
258 117 26 401 10 10
  • HTML: 258
  • PDF: 117
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 401
  • BibTeX: 10
  • EndNote: 10
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 388 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 388 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 08 Mar 2024
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Cup anemometer accuracy is important for wind speed measurements. One important characteristic, dynamic overspeeding, is traditionally considered an inherent and significant error, supported by a two-cup drag model. Newer research show that significantly lower overspeeding might be present for low to medium turbulence intensities. Even zero dynamic overspeeding is possible, supported by a general parabolic model. Sufficiently accurate modelling, however, must be made with tabulated data.