the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Decadal-scale decay of landslide-derived fluvial suspended sediment after Typhoon Morakot
Abstract. Landslides influence fluvial suspended sediment transport by changing sediment supply and grain size, which alter suspended sediment concentrations and fluxes for a period of time after landsliding. To investigate the duration and scale of altered suspended sediment transport due to landsliding, we analyzed suspended sediment concentration and water discharge measurements at 87 gauging stations across Taiwan over an 11-year period after Typhoon Morakot, which generated nearly 20,000 landslides in 2009. At each gauging station, we computed annual rating curves to quantify changes over time in the sensitivity of suspended sediment concentrations to water discharge. Among the 40 stations in basins that were impacted by landsliding, the discharge-normalized rating curve coefficient ã was higher than that before Morakot by a factor of 5.1 ± 1.1 (mean ± standard error) the first year after Morakot (2010). The rating curve exponent b did not decrease at most stations until a year later (2011), when the average b value was lower than that before Morakot by 0.25 ± 0.05. Across the compilation of gauging stations, post-Morakot changes in ã were positively correlated with landslide intensity for seven years after Morakot, while post-Morakot changes in b were negatively correlated with landslide intensity from 2011 to 2014, reflecting a tendency for larger changes in ã and b to occur in basins with more intense landsliding. At 26 of these 40 stations, elevated values of ã declined after the initial post-Morakot peak, consistent with a gradual return to pre-Morakot suspended sediment transport conditions. Exponential regressions to these ã values reveal a median characteristic decay time of 8.8 years (interquartile range: 5.7–14.8 years). Values of ã tended to decline faster in basins with more intense landsliding, with a mean characteristic decay time of 6 years in the basins hardest hit by landsliding. Shortly after Morakot, changes in ã and b tended to be larger in basins with more intense landsliding, but this sensitivity to landsliding decayed away within 4–7 years. At stations that were not impacted or only minimally impacted by landsliding, neither ã nor b exhibited systematic responses to Morakot. To quantify the effect of landsliding on sediment discharge, we compared the measured sediment discharges after Morakot to the hypothetical sediment discharges that would have occurred if Morakot had induced no landslides, calculated by applying each station's pre-Morakot rating curve to its post-Morakot water discharge history. This analysis suggests that Morakot-induced landsliding increased sediment discharge by as much as >10-fold in some basins in the 1–2 years after Morakot. Together, these results indicate that the influence of Morakot-induced landsliding on rating curves was large shortly after Morakot but diminished in less than a decade in most of the study rivers, and will be imperceptible in another few decades in all of the study rivers. To the extent that these results are applicable to other landscapes, this suggests that periods of elevated sediment transport efficiency after landsliding should persist for years to decades, even if the landslide deposits persist for centuries to millennia.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(7708 KB)
-
Supplement
(367 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(7708 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(367 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1278', Aaron Bufe, 08 Aug 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1278', Harrison Martin, 08 Jan 2024
To the editorial team at Earth Surface Dynamics,
I have completed my review of the manuscript “egusphere-2023-1278: Decadal-scale decay of landslide-derived fluvial suspended sediment after Typhoon Morakot” by Ruetenik et al. [https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1278/]. The manuscript uses decades-long river suspended sediment and discharge measurements from a series of stations around Taiwan to investigate the impact of the 2009 Typhoon Morakot its resultant landslides on river suspended sediment delivery over time. The authors show that among a subset of focus stations after Typhoon Morakot, rivers generally had large increases in the rating-curve parameter (meaning that more sediment is delivered for a given discharge) and smaller decreases in the rating-curve parameter (meaning that the amount of sediment delivered becomes less dependent on the magnitude of discharge), both compared to pre-Morakot averages. The peak for occurred within ~1 year, while the decrease in peaked after a couple of years, and both values decayed back to pre-Morakot levels, with the most-affected regions decaying within a couple of decades.
Overall, after a close review, I have found the manuscript to be well-written, mostly clear, and with few typographical or grammatical errors. It is clear that the submission has been treated with care. The work addresses relevant scientific questions to the readership of ESurf, presents novel and reasonable results, and has a method that seems technically sound and reproducible. While the manuscript requires little in the way of major changes, I have some minor comments for the editor’s and authors’ consideration. I have also included line-level comments. While I think that some of my comments bear addressing, others are merely suggestions or observations. The comments can be found in the attached PDF.
I thank the authors for a well-written manuscript. I have enjoyed reading it, and I hope that my comments prove helpful.
Best regards,
Harrison Martin
Postdoctoral Scholar Research Associate
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences
Caltech - AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1278', Gregory Ruetenik, 24 Mar 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1278', Aaron Bufe, 08 Aug 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1278', Harrison Martin, 08 Jan 2024
To the editorial team at Earth Surface Dynamics,
I have completed my review of the manuscript “egusphere-2023-1278: Decadal-scale decay of landslide-derived fluvial suspended sediment after Typhoon Morakot” by Ruetenik et al. [https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1278/]. The manuscript uses decades-long river suspended sediment and discharge measurements from a series of stations around Taiwan to investigate the impact of the 2009 Typhoon Morakot its resultant landslides on river suspended sediment delivery over time. The authors show that among a subset of focus stations after Typhoon Morakot, rivers generally had large increases in the rating-curve parameter (meaning that more sediment is delivered for a given discharge) and smaller decreases in the rating-curve parameter (meaning that the amount of sediment delivered becomes less dependent on the magnitude of discharge), both compared to pre-Morakot averages. The peak for occurred within ~1 year, while the decrease in peaked after a couple of years, and both values decayed back to pre-Morakot levels, with the most-affected regions decaying within a couple of decades.
Overall, after a close review, I have found the manuscript to be well-written, mostly clear, and with few typographical or grammatical errors. It is clear that the submission has been treated with care. The work addresses relevant scientific questions to the readership of ESurf, presents novel and reasonable results, and has a method that seems technically sound and reproducible. While the manuscript requires little in the way of major changes, I have some minor comments for the editor’s and authors’ consideration. I have also included line-level comments. While I think that some of my comments bear addressing, others are merely suggestions or observations. The comments can be found in the attached PDF.
I thank the authors for a well-written manuscript. I have enjoyed reading it, and I hope that my comments prove helpful.
Best regards,
Harrison Martin
Postdoctoral Scholar Research Associate
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences
Caltech - AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1278', Gregory Ruetenik, 24 Mar 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
426 | 166 | 36 | 628 | 39 | 32 | 30 |
- HTML: 426
- PDF: 166
- XML: 36
- Total: 628
- Supplement: 39
- BibTeX: 32
- EndNote: 30
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Gregory Ruetenik
Ken Ferrier
Odin Marc
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(7708 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(367 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper