the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A wave-resolving modeling study of rip current variability, rip hazard, and swimmer escape strategies on an embayed beach with irregular rip channels
Abstract. Drownings due to rip currents are a major threat to beach safety. In this study a high-resolution Boussinesq model with a modified wave-resolving Lagrangian tracking module has been applied to a 2-km-long embayed beach, Dadonghai of Sanya, Hainan Island, with the purpose to study rip current variability, real-time rip hazard identification, and the optimal swimmer escape strategies. Beach stage plays an important role in the occurrence and strength of rip currents. Satellite images of the Dadonghai Beach shows that crescentic bars and shore-connected transverse bars emerge alternatively in the embayed beach, which results in long-term modulation of rip strength periodically according to the modeling. A series of tests are designed and confirms that rip current strength is closely related to wave properties and tidal levels. Spectral analysis of output time series at specific points shows that rip currents fluctuate on the orders of 1 min and 10 min, which reflects the effects of wave-group and VLF (Very Low Frequency) motions. Real-time evaluation of rip hazard is crucial for providing the lifeguards and general public with appropriate information on the occurrence and location of the rip currents, and how to set patrolled area. However, fine-scale numerical modeling using the existing hydrodynamic models are computing-demanding due to a cascade of basin-scale meteorological and wave climate modeling down to the wave-resolving scale. In this study, an attempt of using GPU-accelerated Boussinesq model embedded with the spectral wave model (WAM6) has been made, which enables a faster and more complete description of rip hazard. Lagrangian tracking of virtual swimmers demonstrates that multiple factors contributing to the survival of swimmers caught in the rip currents, include surf-zone bathymetry, rip strength, flow patterns, and swimmer’s position. For weak-to-moderate rip currents and longshore currents, swim onshore consistently seems the most successful strategy across all the scenarios in this study. For swimmers within the inner surf zone, the successful rate is satisfactory by taking strategies of either swim onshore or swim parallel to the beach. Higher surf-zone exit rate along the Dadonghai Beach are not favorable to stay afloat action, which put swimmers at a higher risk of being expelled to deeper water. Pulsation of rip currents in wide rip channels can form swirls or eddies which can also be hazardous to swimmers with weak swimming ability. One of the differences of the present study from the previous works is that the random, wave-resolving modeling was adopted for Lagrangian tracking of virtual swimmers with 1-m resolution. Virtual trajectories yielded by the wave-resolving and wave-averaged velocities are generally consistent with each other. However, using Boussinesq model shows its superiority in studying fine-scale nearshore circulation and its variability, as well as understanding the effects of wave randomness and directional spreading on surf-zone flows.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(62565 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(62565 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-122', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 May 2023
The manuscript authored by Yuan et al studies rip current variability, real-time rip hazard identification, and the optimal swimmer escape strategies at Dadonghai Beach, China considering two bathymetric scenarios between 2018 and 2019.
Overall, the document is very well structured, details each section adequately, and is written in fluent English.
General comments are indicated below and more detailed comments are in the attached document:
- How accurate are the bathymetries derived from satellite imagery concerning measurements? Have any checks been made in the study case?
- Is the beach in dynamic equilibrium, preserving sediment balance? Are the scenarios analyzed from the 2018 and 2019 satellite-derived bathymetries expected to be representative of all summers?
- The model used to obtain the currents has been validated with field measurements? this is essential to validate the directions and magnitudes of the velocities.
- Where is the wave point located? It is essential to know its location in order to describe the wave conditions.
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Huaiwei Yang, 05 Aug 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-122', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 Jun 2023
The paper presents a Boussinesq model study of rip current variability and the evaluation of hazards induced by rip currents. The study showcases the trajectory tracking method used in an embayed beach area for swimmer escape strategies. It is an interesting study.
Because the first author was the developer of FUNWAVE-GPU, I don’t have many concerns about modeling details. However, I feel it may need logical consistency across the entire article, from the introduction to the conclusions. The authors expressed the importance of a wave-resolving model for such a trajectory-tracking study due to the random and dynamic nature of rip currents. But the paper concluded that the results from the Boussinesq model are comparable to that from the wave-averaged method. If the swimmer escape strategies are the main objective of the study, using the expensive Boussinesq model seems to be an overkill. For this reason, I suggest that the authors may emphasize more about the effects of IG and VLF bands because a regular wave averaged model cannot predict IG motions without using a non-stationary wave condition. The VLF motions in the model results are interesting. It is good to check if those are the shear wave mode as said or long gravity wave oscillations. A plot of a wavenumber spectrum would be helpful.
In general, the paper was well-written and easy to follow. It should be published after addressing the issue mentioned above.
Details:
Figure 1(f), please provide the vertical datum for 2018 and 2019 measurements. Provide an accuracy estimate for the satellite-derived bathymetric data.
How does a periodic boundary condition set up in such a bay-like domain?
Line 112, both ends is exposed, grammar
Line 139, FUNWAVE-GPU add the reference here
Line 142, CFL, add the complete terminology
Line 144, friction coefficient, need to clarify bottom friction form, manning formula? or provide a reference
Section 3.3. It’s interesting to make a definition for the hazard levels. Any reference for this definition, or just created by the authors?
Line 181, arbitrary factor of 0.8. need a sensitivity test on this number
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-122-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Huaiwei Yang, 05 Aug 2023
- AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Huaiwei Yang, 05 Aug 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-122', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 May 2023
The manuscript authored by Yuan et al studies rip current variability, real-time rip hazard identification, and the optimal swimmer escape strategies at Dadonghai Beach, China considering two bathymetric scenarios between 2018 and 2019.
Overall, the document is very well structured, details each section adequately, and is written in fluent English.
General comments are indicated below and more detailed comments are in the attached document:
- How accurate are the bathymetries derived from satellite imagery concerning measurements? Have any checks been made in the study case?
- Is the beach in dynamic equilibrium, preserving sediment balance? Are the scenarios analyzed from the 2018 and 2019 satellite-derived bathymetries expected to be representative of all summers?
- The model used to obtain the currents has been validated with field measurements? this is essential to validate the directions and magnitudes of the velocities.
- Where is the wave point located? It is essential to know its location in order to describe the wave conditions.
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Huaiwei Yang, 05 Aug 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-122', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 Jun 2023
The paper presents a Boussinesq model study of rip current variability and the evaluation of hazards induced by rip currents. The study showcases the trajectory tracking method used in an embayed beach area for swimmer escape strategies. It is an interesting study.
Because the first author was the developer of FUNWAVE-GPU, I don’t have many concerns about modeling details. However, I feel it may need logical consistency across the entire article, from the introduction to the conclusions. The authors expressed the importance of a wave-resolving model for such a trajectory-tracking study due to the random and dynamic nature of rip currents. But the paper concluded that the results from the Boussinesq model are comparable to that from the wave-averaged method. If the swimmer escape strategies are the main objective of the study, using the expensive Boussinesq model seems to be an overkill. For this reason, I suggest that the authors may emphasize more about the effects of IG and VLF bands because a regular wave averaged model cannot predict IG motions without using a non-stationary wave condition. The VLF motions in the model results are interesting. It is good to check if those are the shear wave mode as said or long gravity wave oscillations. A plot of a wavenumber spectrum would be helpful.
In general, the paper was well-written and easy to follow. It should be published after addressing the issue mentioned above.
Details:
Figure 1(f), please provide the vertical datum for 2018 and 2019 measurements. Provide an accuracy estimate for the satellite-derived bathymetric data.
How does a periodic boundary condition set up in such a bay-like domain?
Line 112, both ends is exposed, grammar
Line 139, FUNWAVE-GPU add the reference here
Line 142, CFL, add the complete terminology
Line 144, friction coefficient, need to clarify bottom friction form, manning formula? or provide a reference
Section 3.3. It’s interesting to make a definition for the hazard levels. Any reference for this definition, or just created by the authors?
Line 181, arbitrary factor of 0.8. need a sensitivity test on this number
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-122-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Huaiwei Yang, 05 Aug 2023
- AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Huaiwei Yang, 05 Aug 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
255 | 139 | 21 | 415 | 9 | 13 |
- HTML: 255
- PDF: 139
- XML: 21
- Total: 415
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Huaiwei Yang
Fujiang Yu
Yi Gao
Benxia Li
Chuang Xing
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(62565 KB) - Metadata XML