Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1217
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1217
23 Jun 2023
 | 23 Jun 2023

Source attribution of methane emissions from the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland, using isotopic signatures

Alina Fiehn, Maximilian Eckl, Julian Kostinek, Michał Gałkowski, Christoph Gerbig, Michael Rothe, Thomas Röckmann, Malika Menoud, Hossein Maazallahi, Martina Schmidt, Piotr Korbeń, Jarosław Neçki, Mila Stanisavljević, Justyna Swolkień, Andreas Fix, and Anke Roiger

Abstract. Anthropogenic emissions are the primary source of atmospheric methane (CH4) growth. However, estimates of anthropogenic CH4 emissions still show large uncertainties on global and regional scales. Differences in CH4 isotopic source signatures δ13C and δ2H can help to constrain different source contributions (e.g. fossil, waste, agriculture, etc.). The Upper Silesian Coal Basin (USCB) represents one of the largest European CH4 emission regions, with more than 500 Gg CH4 yr-1 released from more than 50 coal mine ventilation shafts and other anthropogenic sources. During the CoMet (Carbon Dioxide and Methane Mission) campaign in June 2018 methane observations were conducted from a variety of platforms including aircraft and cars to quantify these emissions. Beside the continuous sampling of atmospheric methane concentration, numerous air samples were taken from inside and around the ventilation shafts (1–2 km distance) and aboard the High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO) and DLR Cessna Caravan aircraft, and analyzed in the laboratory for the isotopic composition of CH4.

The airborne samples downwind of the USCB contained methane from all sources in the region and thus enabled determining the mean signature of the USCB accurately. This mean isotopic signature of methane emissions was -50.9 ± 0.7 ‰ for δ13C and -226 ± 9 ‰ for δ2H. This is in the range of previous USCB studies based on samples taken within the mines for δ13C, but more depleted in δ2H than reported before. Signatures of methane enhancements sampled upwind of the mines and in the free troposphere clearly showed the influence of biogenic sources (e.g. wetlands, waste, ruminants). The ground-based samples taken during CoMet allowed determining the source signatures of individual coal mine ventilation shafts. These signatures displayed a considerable range between different shafts and also varied for individual shafts from day to day. Mean shaft signatures range from -60 ‰ to -42 ‰ for δ13C and from -200 ‰ to 160 ‰ for δ2H. A gradient in the signatures of sub-regions of the USCB is reflected both in the aircraft data as well as in the ground samples with emissions from the southwest being most depleted in δ2H and emissions from the south most depleted in δ13C. The average signature of -49.8 ± 5.7 ‰ in δ13C and -184 ± 32 ‰ in δ2H from the ventilation shafts fits with values from previous studies, but clearly differs from the USCB regional signature in δ2H. We assume that the USCB plume mainly contains fossil coal mine methane and biogenic methane from waste treatment, because the USCB is a highly industrialized region with few other possible methane sources. Assuming a biogenic methane signature between and -320 ‰ and -280 ‰ for δ2H, the biogenic methane emissions from the USCB account for 15–50 % of total emissions. The share of anthropogenic-biogenic emissions from this densely populated industrial region is underestimated in commonly used emission inventories. Generally, this study demonstrates the importance and usefulness of δ2H-CH4 observations for methane source attribution, but highlights the need of comprehensive and extensive sampling from all possible source sectors.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

21 Dec 2023
Source apportionment of methane emissions from the Upper Silesian Coal Basin using isotopic signatures
Alina Fiehn, Maximilian Eckl, Julian Kostinek, Michał Gałkowski, Christoph Gerbig, Michael Rothe, Thomas Röckmann, Malika Menoud, Hossein Maazallahi, Martina Schmidt, Piotr Korbeń, Jarosław Neçki, Mila Stanisavljević, Justyna Swolkień, Andreas Fix, and Anke Roiger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15749–15765, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15749-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15749-2023, 2023
Short summary
Alina Fiehn, Maximilian Eckl, Julian Kostinek, Michał Gałkowski, Christoph Gerbig, Michael Rothe, Thomas Röckmann, Malika Menoud, Hossein Maazallahi, Martina Schmidt, Piotr Korbeń, Jarosław Neçki, Mila Stanisavljević, Justyna Swolkień, Andreas Fix, and Anke Roiger

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1217', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Jul 2023
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alina Fiehn, 11 Oct 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1217', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Aug 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alina Fiehn, 11 Oct 2023
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1217', Amy Townsend-Small, 10 Aug 2023
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Alina Fiehn, 11 Oct 2023

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1217', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Jul 2023
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alina Fiehn, 11 Oct 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1217', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Aug 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alina Fiehn, 11 Oct 2023
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1217', Amy Townsend-Small, 10 Aug 2023
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Alina Fiehn, 11 Oct 2023

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Alina Fiehn on behalf of the Authors (27 Oct 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (31 Oct 2023) by Farahnaz Khosrawi
AR by Alina Fiehn on behalf of the Authors (02 Nov 2023)  Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

21 Dec 2023
Source apportionment of methane emissions from the Upper Silesian Coal Basin using isotopic signatures
Alina Fiehn, Maximilian Eckl, Julian Kostinek, Michał Gałkowski, Christoph Gerbig, Michael Rothe, Thomas Röckmann, Malika Menoud, Hossein Maazallahi, Martina Schmidt, Piotr Korbeń, Jarosław Neçki, Mila Stanisavljević, Justyna Swolkień, Andreas Fix, and Anke Roiger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15749–15765, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15749-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15749-2023, 2023
Short summary
Alina Fiehn, Maximilian Eckl, Julian Kostinek, Michał Gałkowski, Christoph Gerbig, Michael Rothe, Thomas Röckmann, Malika Menoud, Hossein Maazallahi, Martina Schmidt, Piotr Korbeń, Jarosław Neçki, Mila Stanisavljević, Justyna Swolkień, Andreas Fix, and Anke Roiger
Alina Fiehn, Maximilian Eckl, Julian Kostinek, Michał Gałkowski, Christoph Gerbig, Michael Rothe, Thomas Röckmann, Malika Menoud, Hossein Maazallahi, Martina Schmidt, Piotr Korbeń, Jarosław Neçki, Mila Stanisavljević, Justyna Swolkień, Andreas Fix, and Anke Roiger

Viewed

Total article views: 584 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
414 134 36 584 18 19
  • HTML: 414
  • PDF: 134
  • XML: 36
  • Total: 584
  • BibTeX: 18
  • EndNote: 19
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 557 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 557 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Sep 2024
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
During the CoMet mission in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (USCB) ground-based and airborne air samples were taken, and analyzed for the isotopic composition of CH4 to derive the mean signature of the USCB and the source signatures of individual coal mines. Using δ2H signatures, the biogenic emissions from the USCB account for 15–50 % of total emissions, which is underestimated in common emission inventories. This demonstrates the importance of δ2H-CH4 observations for methane source attribution.