the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Analytical and adaptable initial conditions for moist baroclinic waves in a global hydrostatic model
Abstract. This article presents a description of an analytical, stable and flexible initial background state for moist baroclinic wave simulation on an aquaplanet in order to test dynamical core of numerical weather prediction models and study the dynamics and evolution of extra-tropical cyclones. The initial background state is derived from an analytical zonal wind speed field, or jet structure, and the hydrostatic primitive equations for moist adiabatic and frictionless flow in spherical coordinates. A baroclinic wave can develop only if a unbalanced perturbation is added to the zonal wind speed field. The implementation of this baroclinic wave simulation have been done on the Open Integrated Forecasting System (OpenIFS) cy43r3, a global numerical weather prediction model developed by the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts. In total, seven parameters can be used to control the generation of the initial background state and hence the development of the baroclinic waves in the OpenIFS configuration file: the jet's width, the jet's height, the maximum zonal mean wind speed of the jet, the horizontal mean of the surface virtual temperature, the surface relative humidity, the lapse rate and the surface roughness. Nine dry and nine moist initial background states have been generated to test their stability without perturbations. The meteorological stability of the initial state is investigated by examining the spatial distributions of the equivalent potential temperature, the absolute vorticity and the Brunt-Väisälä frequency. Moreover, the Root-Mean-Squared-Error (RMSE) of the zonal wind speed has been computed to assess their numerical stability. Finally, six of these moist initial initial background state have been used with an unbalanced perturbation to ensure that the baroclinic lifecycles developing are physically realistic. The resulting baroclinic wave is shown to be sensitive to the jet's width. This configuration for baroclinic wave simulations will be used to create large baroclinic lifecycles ensemble to study how extra-tropical cyclones may evolve in the future.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2655 KB)
-
Supplement
(917 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2655 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(917 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1078', Astrid Kerkweg, 18 Aug 2023
Dear authors,
in my role as Executive editor of GMD, I would like to bring to your attention our Editorial version 1.2:
https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2215/2019/
This highlights some requirements of papers published in GMD, which is also available on the GMD website in the ‘Manuscript Types’ section: http://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/submission/manuscript_types.html
In particular, please note that for your paper, the following requirements have not been met in the Discussions paper:
- "The main paper must give the model name and version number (or other unique identifier) in the title."
- "If the model development relates to a single model then the model name and the version number must be included in the title of the paper. If the main intention of an article is to make a general (i.e. model independent) statement about the usefulness of a new development, but the usefulness is shown with the help of one specific model,the model name and version number must be stated in the title. The title could have a form such as, “Title outlining amazing generic advance: a case study with Model XXX (version Y)”.''
Therefore please replace the "a global hydrostatic model" in the title of you manuscript by " the global hydrostatic model OpenIFS (cy43r3)".
Additionally, I want to challenge your statement in the code availability section, that the output can be easily reproduced. Exactly because the OpenIFS model is also not completely open accessible, outputs can not be easily reproduced by every interested reader and as you do not provide your plotting scripts, it can also not be directly be tested if it is infact exactly the same result. Please archive the most important data shown in your paper and provide the plotting scripts for your figures.
Yours, Astrid Kerkweg
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1078-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Clément Bouvier, 11 Sep 2023
Dear Astrid Kerkweg,
Thank you for your comment and sorry for the delay in our response.
We changed the title as suggested: "Analytical and adaptable initial conditions for moist baroclinic
waves in a global hydrostatic model OpenIFS (cy43r3)".
Moreover, we added to the zenodo repository our raw data and cyclone tracked data used to produce the figures and results presented in the preprint. Additionally, we included all plotting scripts used to produce all the figures (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7890586). We changed the "Code and data availability" section accordingly.
Best regards,
Clément Bouvier et al.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1078-AC1 -
AC3: 'Reply on CEC1', Clément Bouvier, 31 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1078/egusphere-2023-1078-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1078', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Sep 2023
This is a very good manuscript which requires only some very minor edits before publication. It is clear and well written describing analytical formulae for initial conditions for a moist baroclinic instability test case to be used in testing dynamical circulation models. My suggestions for editing are as follows:
Line 5 The statement implies a baroclinic wave will ONLY develop if an unbalanced perturbation is added. This is not so since baroclinic instability is essentially a balanced flow instability , a balanced perturbation can also excite wave development.
Line 22 'system' should be 'systems'
Line 24 'pattern' should be 'patterns'
Line 34 'on f-planes' should be 'on an f-plane' and 'β-planes' should be 'a 'β-plane
Line 36 'used approximation' should be' approximation that is used'
Line 94 The zonal wind and gradient and hydrostatic balance, being a balance that is possible in a non-hydrostatic system SHOULD be a valid solution to the full equations of motion, not just the hydrostatic equations.
Equation (16) seems to be missing the terms proportional to F2 and F4
Line 243 Since the factorials have been replace by Gamma functions which are DEFINED in terms of factorials, the factorials have not REALLY disappeared
Line 356 'increase' should be 'increases'
Line 421 'use' should be 'use it'
Lines 570 and 571 A factor of uη is missing
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1078-RC1 -
AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Clément Bouvier, 31 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1078/egusphere-2023-1078-AC4-supplement.pdf
-
AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Clément Bouvier, 31 Jan 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1078', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1078/egusphere-2023-1078-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Clément Bouvier, 31 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1078/egusphere-2023-1078-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Clément Bouvier, 31 Jan 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1078', Astrid Kerkweg, 18 Aug 2023
Dear authors,
in my role as Executive editor of GMD, I would like to bring to your attention our Editorial version 1.2:
https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/12/2215/2019/
This highlights some requirements of papers published in GMD, which is also available on the GMD website in the ‘Manuscript Types’ section: http://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/submission/manuscript_types.html
In particular, please note that for your paper, the following requirements have not been met in the Discussions paper:
- "The main paper must give the model name and version number (or other unique identifier) in the title."
- "If the model development relates to a single model then the model name and the version number must be included in the title of the paper. If the main intention of an article is to make a general (i.e. model independent) statement about the usefulness of a new development, but the usefulness is shown with the help of one specific model,the model name and version number must be stated in the title. The title could have a form such as, “Title outlining amazing generic advance: a case study with Model XXX (version Y)”.''
Therefore please replace the "a global hydrostatic model" in the title of you manuscript by " the global hydrostatic model OpenIFS (cy43r3)".
Additionally, I want to challenge your statement in the code availability section, that the output can be easily reproduced. Exactly because the OpenIFS model is also not completely open accessible, outputs can not be easily reproduced by every interested reader and as you do not provide your plotting scripts, it can also not be directly be tested if it is infact exactly the same result. Please archive the most important data shown in your paper and provide the plotting scripts for your figures.
Yours, Astrid Kerkweg
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1078-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Clément Bouvier, 11 Sep 2023
Dear Astrid Kerkweg,
Thank you for your comment and sorry for the delay in our response.
We changed the title as suggested: "Analytical and adaptable initial conditions for moist baroclinic
waves in a global hydrostatic model OpenIFS (cy43r3)".
Moreover, we added to the zenodo repository our raw data and cyclone tracked data used to produce the figures and results presented in the preprint. Additionally, we included all plotting scripts used to produce all the figures (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7890586). We changed the "Code and data availability" section accordingly.
Best regards,
Clément Bouvier et al.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1078-AC1 -
AC3: 'Reply on CEC1', Clément Bouvier, 31 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1078/egusphere-2023-1078-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1078', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Sep 2023
This is a very good manuscript which requires only some very minor edits before publication. It is clear and well written describing analytical formulae for initial conditions for a moist baroclinic instability test case to be used in testing dynamical circulation models. My suggestions for editing are as follows:
Line 5 The statement implies a baroclinic wave will ONLY develop if an unbalanced perturbation is added. This is not so since baroclinic instability is essentially a balanced flow instability , a balanced perturbation can also excite wave development.
Line 22 'system' should be 'systems'
Line 24 'pattern' should be 'patterns'
Line 34 'on f-planes' should be 'on an f-plane' and 'β-planes' should be 'a 'β-plane
Line 36 'used approximation' should be' approximation that is used'
Line 94 The zonal wind and gradient and hydrostatic balance, being a balance that is possible in a non-hydrostatic system SHOULD be a valid solution to the full equations of motion, not just the hydrostatic equations.
Equation (16) seems to be missing the terms proportional to F2 and F4
Line 243 Since the factorials have been replace by Gamma functions which are DEFINED in terms of factorials, the factorials have not REALLY disappeared
Line 356 'increase' should be 'increases'
Line 421 'use' should be 'use it'
Lines 570 and 571 A factor of uη is missing
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1078-RC1 -
AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Clément Bouvier, 31 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1078/egusphere-2023-1078-AC4-supplement.pdf
-
AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Clément Bouvier, 31 Jan 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1078', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Nov 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1078/egusphere-2023-1078-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Clément Bouvier, 31 Jan 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1078/egusphere-2023-1078-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Clément Bouvier, 31 Jan 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
454 | 156 | 26 | 636 | 45 | 14 | 12 |
- HTML: 454
- PDF: 156
- XML: 26
- Total: 636
- Supplement: 45
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Clément Bouvier
Daan van den Broek
Madeleine Ekblom
Victoria A. Sinclair
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2655 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(917 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper