the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Retrieval of aerosol properties from zenith sky radiance measurements
Abstract. This study explores the potential to retrieve aerosol properties with the GRASP algorithm (Generalized Retrieval of Atmosphere and Surface Properties) using as input measurements of zenith sky radiance (ZSR), which are sky radiances measured in the zenith direction, recorded at four wavelengths by a ZEN-R52 radiometer. To this end, the ZSR measured at 440, 500, 675 and 870 nm by a ZEN-R52 (ZSRZEN), installed in Valladolid (Spain), is employed. This instrument is calibrated intercomparing the signal of each channel with coincident ZSR values simulated (ZSRSIM) at the same wavelengths with a radiative transfer model (RTM). These simulations are carried out using the GRASP forward module as RTM and the aerosol information from a collocated CE318 photometer belonging to the AERONET network (Aerosol and Robotic Network) as input. Dark signal and the signal dependence on temperature are characterized and included in the calibration process. The uncertainties on each channel are quantified by an intercomparison with a collocated CE318 photometer, obtaining lower values for shorter wavelengths; between 3 % for 440 nm and 21 % for 870 nm. The proposed inversion strategy for the aerosol retrieval using the ZSRZEN measurements as input, so-called GRASP-ZEN, assumes the aerosol as an external mixture of five pre calculated aerosol types. A sensitivity analysis is conducted using synthetic ZSRZEN measurements, pointing out that these measurements are sensitive to aerosol load and type. It also assesses that the retrieved aerosol optical depth (AOD) values in general overestimates the reference ones by 0.03, 0.02, 0.02 and 0.01 for 440, 500, 675, 870 nm, respectively. The calibrated ZSRZEN measurements, recorded during two and half years at Valladolid, are inverted by GRASP-ZEN strategy to retrieve some aerosol properties like AOD. The retrieved AOD shows a high correlation with respect independent values obtained from the collocated AERONET CE318 photometer, with a determination coefficient (r2) about 0.86, 0.85, 0.79 and 0.72 for 440, 500, 675 and 870 nm, respectively, and finding uncertainties between 0.02 and 0.03 with respect to the AERONET values. Finally, it is studied the goodness of other retrieved aerosol properties like aerosol volume concentration for total, fine and coarse modes.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(4725 KB)
-
Supplement
(2007 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(4725 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2007 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1040', Francisco Molero, 13 Jun 2023
The manuscript titled "Retrieval of aerosol properties from zenith sky radiance measurements" by Herrero-Anta et al., presents the procedure to extract aerosol properties from zenith sky radiances measured by a newly developed instrument. The inversion algorithm is performed with GRASP and the results are compared with AERONET products. The methodology is well explained, providing details of the calibration, inversion strategy and sensitivity analysis. The manuscript is well written and it presents a substantial contribution to scientific progress within the scope of Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. There are several issues that require a better explanation, and also some minor issues and typos that should be corrected, highlighted in the attached file.
Firstly, the main difference of this measurement strategy respect to AERONET is the use of vertical data instead of that derived by multiple-angles. The AERONET instruments perform principal plane and almucantar measurements to obtain angle information, while the ZEN instrument only measure vertically. Please comment on these different strategies and their effect on the inversions. For instance, would CIMEL vertical measurements (like "Cloud mode" but on clear-sky days) be as reliable as PPL and almucantar? The authors conclude that the GRASP-ZEN measurements produce reliable volume concentration estimations, but not radii estimations. Is it related with the limitation on the measurements (only vertical) or the inversion procedure (limited to five size distributions)?
Secondly, the normalization by extraterrestrial spectra is not clear. The authors conclude (lines 578 & 579) that “proposed methodology incorporates the advantage that it includes the normalization used by GRASP and therefore there is not any need to use extraterrestrial spectra to normalize the data when they are used as input in GRASP”. However, section 2.2 “GRASP methodology” seems to imply that normalization is required. Please clarify this issue
Finally, some technical issues:
- The procedure described in Section 4.2 AERONET scenarios is not clearly explained. Does the AERONET inversions determine the five aerosol types concentrations? Or the AERONET information is input into GRASP directly?
- Details in Figure 1 are difficult to see. Maybe a logarithm Y-axis would help. Also, the details of the fitting may be added, and a residuals graph, to check randomness
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1040/egusphere-2023-1040-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1040', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Jun 2023
Please find attached the review of the paper egusphere-2023-1040 “Retrieval of aerosol properties from zenith sky radiance measurements”
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1040/egusphere-2023-1040-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
-
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1040', Anonymous Referee #3, 04 Jul 2023
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1040/egusphere-2023-1040-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
-
RC4: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1040', Anonymous Referee #4, 11 Jul 2023
This manuscript describes the retrieval of aerosol properties with the synergetic use of zenith sky radiance measurements at 4 wavelengths and GRASP.
The instrument used ZEN-R52 radiometer, is a simple radiometer with uncertainties arising mainly from the temperature dependencies. The authors have done a laboratory characterization of the instrument, introduced corrections and accessed their uncertainties, which were further used in the inversion algorithm.
This paper provides detailed information for the normalization, validation and inversion strategies followed.
This work provides new insights in the possibility of retrieving aerosol properties (AOD, VCT, VCC and VCF) using a simple measurement geometry and skipping the laboratory radiance calibration(or using it for stability monitoring purposes). The results are very promising, and the authors provide information to the community of possible improvements through their validation against AERONET products and uncertainty budget.
The manuscript is clear, but it would improve, if a more concisely writing style was used.
I propose that this article is accepted for publication, after minor revisions.
-
AC4: 'Reply on RC4', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1040/egusphere-2023-1040-AC4-supplement.pdf
-
AC4: 'Reply on RC4', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1040', Francisco Molero, 13 Jun 2023
The manuscript titled "Retrieval of aerosol properties from zenith sky radiance measurements" by Herrero-Anta et al., presents the procedure to extract aerosol properties from zenith sky radiances measured by a newly developed instrument. The inversion algorithm is performed with GRASP and the results are compared with AERONET products. The methodology is well explained, providing details of the calibration, inversion strategy and sensitivity analysis. The manuscript is well written and it presents a substantial contribution to scientific progress within the scope of Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. There are several issues that require a better explanation, and also some minor issues and typos that should be corrected, highlighted in the attached file.
Firstly, the main difference of this measurement strategy respect to AERONET is the use of vertical data instead of that derived by multiple-angles. The AERONET instruments perform principal plane and almucantar measurements to obtain angle information, while the ZEN instrument only measure vertically. Please comment on these different strategies and their effect on the inversions. For instance, would CIMEL vertical measurements (like "Cloud mode" but on clear-sky days) be as reliable as PPL and almucantar? The authors conclude that the GRASP-ZEN measurements produce reliable volume concentration estimations, but not radii estimations. Is it related with the limitation on the measurements (only vertical) or the inversion procedure (limited to five size distributions)?
Secondly, the normalization by extraterrestrial spectra is not clear. The authors conclude (lines 578 & 579) that “proposed methodology incorporates the advantage that it includes the normalization used by GRASP and therefore there is not any need to use extraterrestrial spectra to normalize the data when they are used as input in GRASP”. However, section 2.2 “GRASP methodology” seems to imply that normalization is required. Please clarify this issue
Finally, some technical issues:
- The procedure described in Section 4.2 AERONET scenarios is not clearly explained. Does the AERONET inversions determine the five aerosol types concentrations? Or the AERONET information is input into GRASP directly?
- Details in Figure 1 are difficult to see. Maybe a logarithm Y-axis would help. Also, the details of the fitting may be added, and a residuals graph, to check randomness
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1040/egusphere-2023-1040-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1040', Anonymous Referee #2, 14 Jun 2023
Please find attached the review of the paper egusphere-2023-1040 “Retrieval of aerosol properties from zenith sky radiance measurements”
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1040/egusphere-2023-1040-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
-
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1040', Anonymous Referee #3, 04 Jul 2023
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1040/egusphere-2023-1040-AC3-supplement.pdf
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
-
RC4: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-1040', Anonymous Referee #4, 11 Jul 2023
This manuscript describes the retrieval of aerosol properties with the synergetic use of zenith sky radiance measurements at 4 wavelengths and GRASP.
The instrument used ZEN-R52 radiometer, is a simple radiometer with uncertainties arising mainly from the temperature dependencies. The authors have done a laboratory characterization of the instrument, introduced corrections and accessed their uncertainties, which were further used in the inversion algorithm.
This paper provides detailed information for the normalization, validation and inversion strategies followed.
This work provides new insights in the possibility of retrieving aerosol properties (AOD, VCT, VCC and VCF) using a simple measurement geometry and skipping the laboratory radiance calibration(or using it for stability monitoring purposes). The results are very promising, and the authors provide information to the community of possible improvements through their validation against AERONET products and uncertainty budget.
The manuscript is clear, but it would improve, if a more concisely writing style was used.
I propose that this article is accepted for publication, after minor revisions.
-
AC4: 'Reply on RC4', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-1040/egusphere-2023-1040-AC4-supplement.pdf
-
AC4: 'Reply on RC4', Sara Herrero Anta, 08 Aug 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Data sets
AERONET version 3 David M. Giles, Alexander Sinyuk, Mikhail G. Sorokin, Joel S. Schafer, Alexander Smirnov, Ilya Slutsker, Thomas F. Eck, Brent N. Holben, Jasper R. Lewis, James R. Campbell, Ellsworth J. Welton, Sergey V. Korkin, and Alexei I. Lyapustin https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019
Model code and software
GRASP Oleg Dubovik, David Fuertes, Pavel Litvinov, Anton Lopatin, Tatyana Lapyonok, Ivan Doubovik , Feng Xu, Fabrice Ducos , Cheng Chen, Benjamin Torres, Yevgeny Derimian, Lei Li, Marcos Herreras-Giralda , Milagros Herrera, Yana Karol , Christian Matar , Gregory L. Schuster , Reed Espinosa , Anin Puthukkudy , Zhengqiang Li, Juergen Fischer, Rene Preusker, Juan Cuesta, Axel Kreuter, Alexander Cede, Michael Aspetsberger , Daniel Marth, Lukas Bindreiter, Andreas Hangler, Verena Lanzinger, Christoph Holter and Christian Federspiel https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2021.706851
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
325 | 124 | 30 | 479 | 45 | 13 | 12 |
- HTML: 325
- PDF: 124
- XML: 30
- Total: 479
- Supplement: 45
- BibTeX: 13
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Roberto Román
David Mateos
Ramiro González
Juan Carlos Antuña-Sánchez
Marcos Herreras-Giralda
Antonio Fernando Almansa
Daniel González-Fernández
Celia Herrero del Barrio
Carlos Toledano
Victoria Eugenia Cachorro
Ángel Máximo de Frutos
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(4725 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2007 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper