the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Precipitation reconstructions for Paris based on the observations of Louis Morin, 1665–1713 CE
Abstract. This paper presents a precipitation reconstruction that is based on the continuous observations by Louis Morin in Paris from 1665–1713. Morin usually recorded precipitation intensity and duration, when it snowed/rained, three times each day (sometimes up to six times). The consistency of his observations can be calculated from his other measurements and observations (e.g. temperature, cloud cover), where at least one entry of his different measurements and observations for 98.7 % of all days is noted. To 5 convert these observations to common units, we calibrated them with a multiplicative interacting model using Philippe and Gabriele-Philippe de la Hire’s instrumental measurements from Paris. The two series of measurements by de la Hire (father and son) and observations by Morin overlap from 1688–1713. To test the quality of the reconstruction, we analyzed it with the de la Hire’s measurements, proxy data, an internal analysis of Morin’s measurements of different climate variables, and modern data. Thus, we assess the reliability of the precipitation reconstructions based on Morin’s data as follows. We have moderate confidence regarding the exact quantities of daily, seasonal, and annual precipitation totals. We have low confidence regarding exceptionally high precipitation amounts, but we have high confidence in the indices of an impact analysis (i.e., dry days, wet days, consecutive dry days, consecutive wet days), in monthly frequencies of rainfall, and in interannual, interseasonal, and interdecadal variability. Rainy seasons with precipitation totals greater than 250 mm occurred in MAM 1682, JJA 1682, SON 1687, JJA 1697 and JJA 1703. Furthermore, compared to other DJF seasons, the winter of 1666/67 stands out with a precipitation total of 248 mm. Dry seasons with precipitation totals less than 60 mm occurred in SON 1669, DJF 1690/91 and DJF 1693/94. An impact analysis shows no abnormalities regarding consecutive dry days or wet days in MAM. In JJA a longer dry period of 31 days appeared in 1686 and a dry period of 69 days appeared in DJF 1671/72.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(886 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(886 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1445', Cary Mock, 07 Mar 2023
Overall, this is a very good paper that provides a unique approach in historical climatology on quantitative precipitation reconstruction for Paris in the Little Ice Age. Morin provided a unique record to conduct such a study. The authors provide nice descriptions of the data and methods (including the transfer functions), as well a potential drawback issues such as wind and evaporation on precipitation, comparisons with other types of data that include isotopes. The visuals mostly look quite good. I only have a few minor comments.
1) Around Line 65, Section 2.1. Did Morin also have any seasonal aspect on his observations times due to changes in daytime, sunlight, etc.? Also, with daytime observation times, I assume potential lack of rain observations at night?  (briefly touched on Line 140 but should be expanded).  If there is any nocturnal aspect to precipitation generating controls, those would be missing in the reconstruction.
2) Figure 3 and around Line 190. I am pleased to see scatterplots for the calibration, but wonder with the Pearson’s Correlation used, it utilizes the more non-parametric aspects of the precipitation data. Perhaps using Spearman’s Correlation should also be included. The non-parametric aspects also apply elsewhere such as Figure 5.
3) Line 19. Precipitation and temperature are not the only important climatic elements, probably the most straightforward elements.
4)Â For some of the figures, all axis titles should be capitalized (first letter) for consistency, and the font size could be increased in some of the figures (ex. Figure 9)Â Figure 4 provides an ideal example.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1445-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Pliemon, 22 Mar 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1445', Neil Macdonald, 24 Jul 2023
This is a well written and detailed paper exploring the diaries and records of Louis Morin, Paris (1665-1713). The paper provides a detailed analysis, which is sound and robust, in places additional detail would enable the reader to develop a more detailed understanding of Morin and his intentions, but the analysis is good. Some minor improvements in clarity or expression may be achieved and an annotated copy of the manuscript is attached to help the authors undertake these changes. I have also flagged in a couple of places sections where I felt the arguments presented warranted reflection and were other works could be used to support arguments.Â
Â
You might consider comparing the snow series information presented to that from the Manley snow series for London, a rare comparable record for the period.Â
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Pliemon, 15 Aug 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1445', Cary Mock, 07 Mar 2023
Overall, this is a very good paper that provides a unique approach in historical climatology on quantitative precipitation reconstruction for Paris in the Little Ice Age. Morin provided a unique record to conduct such a study. The authors provide nice descriptions of the data and methods (including the transfer functions), as well a potential drawback issues such as wind and evaporation on precipitation, comparisons with other types of data that include isotopes. The visuals mostly look quite good. I only have a few minor comments.
1) Around Line 65, Section 2.1. Did Morin also have any seasonal aspect on his observations times due to changes in daytime, sunlight, etc.? Also, with daytime observation times, I assume potential lack of rain observations at night?  (briefly touched on Line 140 but should be expanded).  If there is any nocturnal aspect to precipitation generating controls, those would be missing in the reconstruction.
2) Figure 3 and around Line 190. I am pleased to see scatterplots for the calibration, but wonder with the Pearson’s Correlation used, it utilizes the more non-parametric aspects of the precipitation data. Perhaps using Spearman’s Correlation should also be included. The non-parametric aspects also apply elsewhere such as Figure 5.
3) Line 19. Precipitation and temperature are not the only important climatic elements, probably the most straightforward elements.
4)Â For some of the figures, all axis titles should be capitalized (first letter) for consistency, and the font size could be increased in some of the figures (ex. Figure 9)Â Figure 4 provides an ideal example.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1445-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Pliemon, 22 Mar 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-1445', Neil Macdonald, 24 Jul 2023
This is a well written and detailed paper exploring the diaries and records of Louis Morin, Paris (1665-1713). The paper provides a detailed analysis, which is sound and robust, in places additional detail would enable the reader to develop a more detailed understanding of Morin and his intentions, but the analysis is good. Some minor improvements in clarity or expression may be achieved and an annotated copy of the manuscript is attached to help the authors undertake these changes. I have also flagged in a couple of places sections where I felt the arguments presented warranted reflection and were other works could be used to support arguments.Â
Â
You might consider comparing the snow series information presented to that from the Manley snow series for London, a rare comparable record for the period.Â
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Pliemon, 15 Aug 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
382 | 136 | 20 | 538 | 5 | 5 |
- HTML: 382
- PDF: 136
- XML: 20
- Total: 538
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Thomas Pliemon
Ulrich Foelsche
Christian Rohr
Christian Pfister
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(886 KB) - Metadata XML