the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
| 09 Dec 2022
Paleontology-themed comics and graphic novels, their potential for scientific outreach, and the bilingual graphic novel EUROPASAURUS – Life on Jurassic Islands
Abstract. The first part of this article gives an overview of influential comics and graphic novels on paleontological themes from the last twelve decades. Through different forms of representation and narration, both clichés and the latest findings from paleontological research are presented in comics in an entertaining way for a broad audience. As a result, comics are often chroniclers of 20th century scientific history and contemporary paleoart. The second part of this article deals with the development of the bilingual graphic novel EUROPASAURUS – Life on Jurassic Islands, which communicates knowledge from universities as well as museums to the public. This non-verbal comic presents the results of a paleontological research project on a Late Jurassic terrestrial biota from northern Germany in both a scientifically accurate as well as an easily understandable way, based on the way of life of various organisms and their habitats. Insights into the creative process, the perception of the book by the public, and ideas on how to raise public awareness of such a project are discussed.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(19186 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(19186 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-945', Jeff Liston, 07 Feb 2023
Firstly, my apologies to both authors and editors for the protracted period of response delivery, for which I will not waste anyone's time with excuses for. The manuscript itself is extremely thorough and enjoyable to read, as well as being accompanied by an unusually comprehensive set of survey data. In particular, I commend the mention of Jane Werner Watson's book - which was my definitive gateway into palaeontology as a 5 year old - as an influential source of Zallinger images, potentially more important to the public audience than the Peabody mural, with its more academic role.
Thus there are very few modifications that I would deign to suggest and they definitely fall in the 'typos/technical corrections' category rather than that of minor revisions.
Line 72: 'where primary' replace with 'were primarily';
line 78: probably more correct to use the plural with the possessive, hence 'kid's stuff' or 'kids' stuff';
line 85: at end of sentence, suggest addition - 'in children's books, a market where it is rarely seen by publishers as necessary to be up-to-date.' If necessary, I think Darren Naish has written about this particular aspect, particularly as a writer.
line 87: 'on the latest'
line 88: singular so 'medium' in this case;
line 107: consider 'preexisting' over 'existing';
line 120: 'generations for how';
line 142: 'lifeforms' plural is (bizarrely) one word rather than two;
line 176: replace 'were' for 'where';
line 207: I would argue for insertion of heroes as well as villains (if possibly '(or heroes)' in parenthesis);
line 214: 'to explain the presence of the prehistoric creatures';
line 222: remove duplicated citation of Merkl, 2015 on this line;
line 332: replace 'Classic' with 'Classics'?;
line 356: I think either remove the comma before 'resemble' or insert another one before 'depicting';
lines 402-408 & 410-417 are essentially duplicated paragraphs - recommend condensing into one;
line 577: I'd say 'were' rather than 'was' here;
line 643: remove 'are' from between nine and originated;
line 688: consider switching to 'Neither dialogue can';
Overall I must applaud the authors for the scope that they have embraced in putting this piece together, and the necessary time that they have invested in 'doing it properly', in particular with regard to approaching all rights holders (which was complicated enough for myself with a far more limited range, than approaching the many corporations that the authors have). This has enabled an excellent 'art history lecture' style approach, with side by side images for direct comparison to clearly demonstrate dirrect influence. In particular - in addition to touching many titles that I have previously considered with reference to dinosaurs in comics - the authors have reminded me of a Gold Key Tarzan comic that I acquired around the same time as I was reading Jane Werner Watson, with dinosaurs on the cover, which I should really check...
Thanks to the authors for putting this piece together and to the editor for considering me as a reviewer.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-945-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Oliver Wings, 02 Mar 2023
We would like to sincerely thank referee Jeff Liston for his valuable suggestions and positive comments, which we found very useful to improve our manuscript.
We already incorporated all technical corrections in the revised version of our manuscript:
line 72: 'where primary' replace with 'were primarily';
Corrected.
line 78: probably more correct to use the plural with the possessive, hence 'kid's stuff' or 'kids' stuff';
Corrected.
line 85: at end of sentence, suggest addition - 'in children's books, a market where it is rarely seen by publishers as necessary to be up-to-date.' If necessary, I think Darren Naish has written about this particular aspect, particularly as a writer.
Amended.
line 87: 'on the latest'
Corrected.
line 88: singular so 'medium' in this case;
Corrected.
line 107: consider 'preexisting' over 'existing';
Corrected.
line 120: 'generations for how';
Corrected.
line 142: 'lifeforms' plural is (bizarrely) one word rather than two;
Corrected.
line 176: replace 'were' for 'where';
Corrected.
line 207: I would argue for insertion of heroes as well as villains (if possibly '(or heroes)' in parenthesis);
Corrected.
line 214: 'to explain the presence of the prehistoric creatures';
Corrected.
line 222: remove duplicated citation of Merkl, 2015 on this line;
Corrected.
line 332: replace 'Classic' with 'Classics'?;
Corrected.
line 356: I think either remove the comma before 'resemble' or insert another one before 'depicting';
Corrected.
lines 402-408 & 410-417 are essentially duplicated paragraphs - recommend condensing into one;
Corrected.
line 577: I'd say 'were' rather than 'was' here;
Corrected.
line 643: remove 'are' from between nine and originated;
Corrected.
line 688: consider switching to 'Neither dialogue can';
Corrected.
Overall I must applaud the authors for the scope that they have embraced in putting this piece together, and the necessary time that they have invested in 'doing it properly', in particular with regard to approaching all rights holders (which was complicated enough for myself with a far more limited range, than approaching the many corporations that the authors have). This has enabled an excellent 'art history lecture' style approach, with side by side images for direct comparison to clearly demonstrate dirrect influence. In particular - in addition to touching many titles that I have previously considered with reference to dinosaurs in comics - the authors have reminded me of a Gold Key Tarzan comic that I acquired around the same time as I was reading Jane Werner Watson, with dinosaurs on the cover, which I should really check...
Thanks to the authors for putting this piece together and to the editor for considering me as a reviewer.
Thank you for all this praise! We are very glad that you enjoyed our manuscript so much! :-)
The authors
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-945-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Oliver Wings, 02 Mar 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-945', Victoria Coules, 12 Feb 2023
This is a welcome contribution to the study of the dissemination of palaeontology as a science but also to scholars of visual culture, in which comic strips and graphic novels are increasingly of interest. The paper has a clear structure, the two parts complementing each other. The authors are to be congratulated on the first part, a comprehensive survey of the existing material with extensive illustrations and a clear breakdown of the different genres. The second part is a very thorough examination, not only of how the graphic novel was created but the responses of readers. I am happy to recommend acceptance subject to minor technical revisions and consider it an important addition to the literature on the public understanding of science.
Like the previous reviewer, I picked up a few typo / minor errors and in a few places, I suggest a slight rewording, as I am assuming (possibly unjustified, in which case apologies) that it was written by native German speakers. (In the interest of clarity, I do a lot of copy editing for Austrian clients who, like these authors, speak and write impeccable English but occasionally slight quirks creep in.) This is not meant to be negative or critical but to hopefully improve an already excellent piece.
As I have cross-checked my notes with those very through suggestions of the previous reviewer, I only add here any thoughts additional to those. By line number:
46 ‘… dinosaur research, which often reaches..’ (research is singular)
63 possibly reword ‘goal to encourage other scientists..’ to goal of encouraging other scientists..’
102 don’t need the comma after ..‘public awareness’ as the link is carried by ‘because…
146 possibly reword ‘..he was offered to add..’ with ‘.. he was commissioned to add..’ or ‘offered the commission of adding..’
147 I’m not sure if ‘model’ is the right word here, do you mean an initial schematic, preliminary version or test piece? Model tends to imply a three-dimensional object like a maquette.
188 do you mean ‘Like most other comics, strips involving..’?
191 being really picky (!) I’d prefer the use of a ‘;’ rather than a ‘:’
207 possible reword ‘… necessary to advance the story..’
265 possible reword to avoid repeat of ‘too’. .. of Stone also chose a lost world setting.’
304 Not sure, so a question: should ‘ice age’ be ‘Ice Age’ ?
337 being annoyingly picky again, the ‘;’ should be a ‘,’
Like the previous reviewer, I noticed that lines 413 to 417 are a duplicate of lines 404 to 408. I agree that merging the two paragraphs into one should solve this.
505 possibly reword ‘.. interest for more information..’ could be ‘.. interest in more information..’
550 possible reword ‘suitable to teaching’ could be ‘suitable for teaching’
593 perhaps ‘interestingness’ could be ‘interest’?
657 being picky, the clause following the ‘:’ doesn’t need a ‘G’ it can be ‘.. as follows: graphic..’
The analysis of the images works well, and if I have a criticism it’s that the references to other art influences could have been expanded, such as referencing Caspar David Friederich and the Hudson River School, although this is more being intrigued and wanting to know more rather than a negative criticism.
I was very pleased to be asked to review this and commend the authors on a professional, comprehensive and intriguing paper. I look forward to seeing it in its final published form.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-945-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Oliver Wings, 02 Mar 2023
We would like to sincerely thank referee Victoria Coules for her valuable suggestions and improvements as well as her positive comments, which we found really useful to further improve our manuscript.
All authors do indeed speak German as their native tongue and despite decades of practice, some language quirks still slip in. So, all language corrections are very much appreciated!
We incorporated almost all technical corrections in a revised version of our manuscript and commented on the one which we left unchanged:
46 ‘… dinosaur research, which often reaches..’ (research is singular)
Corrected.
63 possibly reword ‘goal to encourage other scientists..’ to goal of encouraging other scientists..’
Corrected.
102 don’t need the comma after ..‘public awareness’ as the link is carried by ‘because…
Corrected.
146 possibly reword ‘..he was offered to add..’ with ‘.. he was commissioned to add..’ or ‘offered the commission of adding..’
We decided to leave this wording unchanged because in the book “Age of Reptiles“ by Rosemary Vople from 2007 Rudolph Zallinger himself described (on page 7) this job simply as "an offer“ in the chapter about the creation of the mural.
147 I’m not sure if ‘model’ is the right word here, do you mean an initial schematic, preliminary version or test piece? Model tends to imply a three-dimensional object like a maquette.
Zallinger wrote (page 12 in Vople, 2007) “preliminary small-scale painting, or model, …“ and we decided to use exactly the same phase now to avoid confusion.
188 do you mean ‘Like most other comics, strips involving..’?
Corrected.
191 being really picky (!) I’d prefer the use of a ‘;’ rather than a ‘:’
Corrected.
207 possible reword ‘… necessary to advance the story..’
Corrected.
265 possible reword to avoid repeat of ‘too’. .. of Stone also chose a lost world setting.’
Corrected.
304 Not sure, so a question: should ‘ice age’ be ‘Ice Age’ ?
Yes, it is about the last glacial period. Corrected.
337 being annoyingly picky again, the ‘;’ should be a ‘,’
Corrected.
Like the previous reviewer, I noticed that lines 413 to 417 are a duplicate of lines 404 to 408. I agree that merging the two paragraphs into one should solve this.
Corrected.
505 possibly reword ‘.. interest for more information..’ could be ‘.. interest in more information..’
Corrected.
550 possible reword ‘suitable to teaching’ could be ‘suitable for teaching’
Corrected.
593 perhaps ‘interestingness’ could be ‘interest’?
Corrected.
657 being picky, the clause following the ‘:’ doesn’t need a ‘G’ it can be ‘.. as follows: graphic..’
Corrected.
The analysis of the images works well, and if I have a criticism it’s that the references to other art influences could have been expanded, such as referencing Caspar David Friederich and the Hudson River School, although this is more being intrigued and wanting to know more rather than a negative criticism.
Thank you for this valuable suggestion! We extended the part about art influences and have now included three more figures, which show the classic originals which served as inspiration together with the corresponding pages in the graphic novel. In our opinion, these figures do indeed further improve our manuscript.
I was very pleased to be asked to review this and commend the authors on a professional, comprehensive and intriguing paper. I look forward to seeing it in its final published form.
Thanks again for this helpful and review!
Please note, that while working on the suggested corrections, we decided to partially rewrite and slightly expand section 2.4 (survey results) to reference all diagrams in this figure directly. We also added a few more diagrams in order to provide additional information. In the latest version of our manuscript, this figure is now also included in the main article and no longer suggested as a supplement.
During our revision we also corrected some other minor issues with references and amended the manuscript in very few places.
The authors
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-945-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Oliver Wings, 02 Mar 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-945', Jeff Liston, 07 Feb 2023
Firstly, my apologies to both authors and editors for the protracted period of response delivery, for which I will not waste anyone's time with excuses for. The manuscript itself is extremely thorough and enjoyable to read, as well as being accompanied by an unusually comprehensive set of survey data. In particular, I commend the mention of Jane Werner Watson's book - which was my definitive gateway into palaeontology as a 5 year old - as an influential source of Zallinger images, potentially more important to the public audience than the Peabody mural, with its more academic role.
Thus there are very few modifications that I would deign to suggest and they definitely fall in the 'typos/technical corrections' category rather than that of minor revisions.
Line 72: 'where primary' replace with 'were primarily';
line 78: probably more correct to use the plural with the possessive, hence 'kid's stuff' or 'kids' stuff';
line 85: at end of sentence, suggest addition - 'in children's books, a market where it is rarely seen by publishers as necessary to be up-to-date.' If necessary, I think Darren Naish has written about this particular aspect, particularly as a writer.
line 87: 'on the latest'
line 88: singular so 'medium' in this case;
line 107: consider 'preexisting' over 'existing';
line 120: 'generations for how';
line 142: 'lifeforms' plural is (bizarrely) one word rather than two;
line 176: replace 'were' for 'where';
line 207: I would argue for insertion of heroes as well as villains (if possibly '(or heroes)' in parenthesis);
line 214: 'to explain the presence of the prehistoric creatures';
line 222: remove duplicated citation of Merkl, 2015 on this line;
line 332: replace 'Classic' with 'Classics'?;
line 356: I think either remove the comma before 'resemble' or insert another one before 'depicting';
lines 402-408 & 410-417 are essentially duplicated paragraphs - recommend condensing into one;
line 577: I'd say 'were' rather than 'was' here;
line 643: remove 'are' from between nine and originated;
line 688: consider switching to 'Neither dialogue can';
Overall I must applaud the authors for the scope that they have embraced in putting this piece together, and the necessary time that they have invested in 'doing it properly', in particular with regard to approaching all rights holders (which was complicated enough for myself with a far more limited range, than approaching the many corporations that the authors have). This has enabled an excellent 'art history lecture' style approach, with side by side images for direct comparison to clearly demonstrate dirrect influence. In particular - in addition to touching many titles that I have previously considered with reference to dinosaurs in comics - the authors have reminded me of a Gold Key Tarzan comic that I acquired around the same time as I was reading Jane Werner Watson, with dinosaurs on the cover, which I should really check...
Thanks to the authors for putting this piece together and to the editor for considering me as a reviewer.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-945-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Oliver Wings, 02 Mar 2023
We would like to sincerely thank referee Jeff Liston for his valuable suggestions and positive comments, which we found very useful to improve our manuscript.
We already incorporated all technical corrections in the revised version of our manuscript:
line 72: 'where primary' replace with 'were primarily';
Corrected.
line 78: probably more correct to use the plural with the possessive, hence 'kid's stuff' or 'kids' stuff';
Corrected.
line 85: at end of sentence, suggest addition - 'in children's books, a market where it is rarely seen by publishers as necessary to be up-to-date.' If necessary, I think Darren Naish has written about this particular aspect, particularly as a writer.
Amended.
line 87: 'on the latest'
Corrected.
line 88: singular so 'medium' in this case;
Corrected.
line 107: consider 'preexisting' over 'existing';
Corrected.
line 120: 'generations for how';
Corrected.
line 142: 'lifeforms' plural is (bizarrely) one word rather than two;
Corrected.
line 176: replace 'were' for 'where';
Corrected.
line 207: I would argue for insertion of heroes as well as villains (if possibly '(or heroes)' in parenthesis);
Corrected.
line 214: 'to explain the presence of the prehistoric creatures';
Corrected.
line 222: remove duplicated citation of Merkl, 2015 on this line;
Corrected.
line 332: replace 'Classic' with 'Classics'?;
Corrected.
line 356: I think either remove the comma before 'resemble' or insert another one before 'depicting';
Corrected.
lines 402-408 & 410-417 are essentially duplicated paragraphs - recommend condensing into one;
Corrected.
line 577: I'd say 'were' rather than 'was' here;
Corrected.
line 643: remove 'are' from between nine and originated;
Corrected.
line 688: consider switching to 'Neither dialogue can';
Corrected.
Overall I must applaud the authors for the scope that they have embraced in putting this piece together, and the necessary time that they have invested in 'doing it properly', in particular with regard to approaching all rights holders (which was complicated enough for myself with a far more limited range, than approaching the many corporations that the authors have). This has enabled an excellent 'art history lecture' style approach, with side by side images for direct comparison to clearly demonstrate dirrect influence. In particular - in addition to touching many titles that I have previously considered with reference to dinosaurs in comics - the authors have reminded me of a Gold Key Tarzan comic that I acquired around the same time as I was reading Jane Werner Watson, with dinosaurs on the cover, which I should really check...
Thanks to the authors for putting this piece together and to the editor for considering me as a reviewer.
Thank you for all this praise! We are very glad that you enjoyed our manuscript so much! :-)
The authors
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-945-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Oliver Wings, 02 Mar 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-945', Victoria Coules, 12 Feb 2023
This is a welcome contribution to the study of the dissemination of palaeontology as a science but also to scholars of visual culture, in which comic strips and graphic novels are increasingly of interest. The paper has a clear structure, the two parts complementing each other. The authors are to be congratulated on the first part, a comprehensive survey of the existing material with extensive illustrations and a clear breakdown of the different genres. The second part is a very thorough examination, not only of how the graphic novel was created but the responses of readers. I am happy to recommend acceptance subject to minor technical revisions and consider it an important addition to the literature on the public understanding of science.
Like the previous reviewer, I picked up a few typo / minor errors and in a few places, I suggest a slight rewording, as I am assuming (possibly unjustified, in which case apologies) that it was written by native German speakers. (In the interest of clarity, I do a lot of copy editing for Austrian clients who, like these authors, speak and write impeccable English but occasionally slight quirks creep in.) This is not meant to be negative or critical but to hopefully improve an already excellent piece.
As I have cross-checked my notes with those very through suggestions of the previous reviewer, I only add here any thoughts additional to those. By line number:
46 ‘… dinosaur research, which often reaches..’ (research is singular)
63 possibly reword ‘goal to encourage other scientists..’ to goal of encouraging other scientists..’
102 don’t need the comma after ..‘public awareness’ as the link is carried by ‘because…
146 possibly reword ‘..he was offered to add..’ with ‘.. he was commissioned to add..’ or ‘offered the commission of adding..’
147 I’m not sure if ‘model’ is the right word here, do you mean an initial schematic, preliminary version or test piece? Model tends to imply a three-dimensional object like a maquette.
188 do you mean ‘Like most other comics, strips involving..’?
191 being really picky (!) I’d prefer the use of a ‘;’ rather than a ‘:’
207 possible reword ‘… necessary to advance the story..’
265 possible reword to avoid repeat of ‘too’. .. of Stone also chose a lost world setting.’
304 Not sure, so a question: should ‘ice age’ be ‘Ice Age’ ?
337 being annoyingly picky again, the ‘;’ should be a ‘,’
Like the previous reviewer, I noticed that lines 413 to 417 are a duplicate of lines 404 to 408. I agree that merging the two paragraphs into one should solve this.
505 possibly reword ‘.. interest for more information..’ could be ‘.. interest in more information..’
550 possible reword ‘suitable to teaching’ could be ‘suitable for teaching’
593 perhaps ‘interestingness’ could be ‘interest’?
657 being picky, the clause following the ‘:’ doesn’t need a ‘G’ it can be ‘.. as follows: graphic..’
The analysis of the images works well, and if I have a criticism it’s that the references to other art influences could have been expanded, such as referencing Caspar David Friederich and the Hudson River School, although this is more being intrigued and wanting to know more rather than a negative criticism.
I was very pleased to be asked to review this and commend the authors on a professional, comprehensive and intriguing paper. I look forward to seeing it in its final published form.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-945-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Oliver Wings, 02 Mar 2023
We would like to sincerely thank referee Victoria Coules for her valuable suggestions and improvements as well as her positive comments, which we found really useful to further improve our manuscript.
All authors do indeed speak German as their native tongue and despite decades of practice, some language quirks still slip in. So, all language corrections are very much appreciated!
We incorporated almost all technical corrections in a revised version of our manuscript and commented on the one which we left unchanged:
46 ‘… dinosaur research, which often reaches..’ (research is singular)
Corrected.
63 possibly reword ‘goal to encourage other scientists..’ to goal of encouraging other scientists..’
Corrected.
102 don’t need the comma after ..‘public awareness’ as the link is carried by ‘because…
Corrected.
146 possibly reword ‘..he was offered to add..’ with ‘.. he was commissioned to add..’ or ‘offered the commission of adding..’
We decided to leave this wording unchanged because in the book “Age of Reptiles“ by Rosemary Vople from 2007 Rudolph Zallinger himself described (on page 7) this job simply as "an offer“ in the chapter about the creation of the mural.
147 I’m not sure if ‘model’ is the right word here, do you mean an initial schematic, preliminary version or test piece? Model tends to imply a three-dimensional object like a maquette.
Zallinger wrote (page 12 in Vople, 2007) “preliminary small-scale painting, or model, …“ and we decided to use exactly the same phase now to avoid confusion.
188 do you mean ‘Like most other comics, strips involving..’?
Corrected.
191 being really picky (!) I’d prefer the use of a ‘;’ rather than a ‘:’
Corrected.
207 possible reword ‘… necessary to advance the story..’
Corrected.
265 possible reword to avoid repeat of ‘too’. .. of Stone also chose a lost world setting.’
Corrected.
304 Not sure, so a question: should ‘ice age’ be ‘Ice Age’ ?
Yes, it is about the last glacial period. Corrected.
337 being annoyingly picky again, the ‘;’ should be a ‘,’
Corrected.
Like the previous reviewer, I noticed that lines 413 to 417 are a duplicate of lines 404 to 408. I agree that merging the two paragraphs into one should solve this.
Corrected.
505 possibly reword ‘.. interest for more information..’ could be ‘.. interest in more information..’
Corrected.
550 possible reword ‘suitable to teaching’ could be ‘suitable for teaching’
Corrected.
593 perhaps ‘interestingness’ could be ‘interest’?
Corrected.
657 being picky, the clause following the ‘:’ doesn’t need a ‘G’ it can be ‘.. as follows: graphic..’
Corrected.
The analysis of the images works well, and if I have a criticism it’s that the references to other art influences could have been expanded, such as referencing Caspar David Friederich and the Hudson River School, although this is more being intrigued and wanting to know more rather than a negative criticism.
Thank you for this valuable suggestion! We extended the part about art influences and have now included three more figures, which show the classic originals which served as inspiration together with the corresponding pages in the graphic novel. In our opinion, these figures do indeed further improve our manuscript.
I was very pleased to be asked to review this and commend the authors on a professional, comprehensive and intriguing paper. I look forward to seeing it in its final published form.
Thanks again for this helpful and review!
Please note, that while working on the suggested corrections, we decided to partially rewrite and slightly expand section 2.4 (survey results) to reference all diagrams in this figure directly. We also added a few more diagrams in order to provide additional information. In the latest version of our manuscript, this figure is now also included in the main article and no longer suggested as a supplement.
During our revision we also corrected some other minor issues with references and amended the manuscript in very few places.
The authors
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-945-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Oliver Wings, 02 Mar 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 316 | 133 | 16 | 465 | 5 | 4 |
- HTML: 316
- PDF: 133
- XML: 16
- Total: 465
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Jan Fischer
Joschua Knüppe
Henning Ahlers
Sebastian Körnig
Arila-Maria Perl
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(19186 KB) - Metadata XML