the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Stream laws in tectonic landscape analogue models
Abstract. The interplay between tectonics and surface processes defines the evolution of mountain belts. However, correlating these processes through the evolution of natural orogens represents a scientific challenge. Analogue models can be used for analyzing and interpreting the effect of such interaction. We use nine analog models characterized by different combinations of imposed regional slope and rainfall rates to investigate how a small scale orogen evolves in response to tectonics and surface processes. We show how the combination of these parameters control the development of drainage networks and erosional processes. We quantify the different morphological expression of analogue landscapes in terms of a proposed Ae number that accounts for both observables and boundary conditions. We find few differences between analogue models and natural prototypes, in terms of parametrization of the detachment-limited stream power law. We observe a threshold in the development of channelization, modulated by a tradeoff between applied boundary conditions.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1015 KB)
-
Supplement
(953 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1015 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(953 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-911', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Dec 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-911/egusphere-2022-911-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-911', Greg Hancock, 29 Mar 2023
Dear Authors,
The paper presents the results of some detailed experimental studies at the laboratory scale. The topic and results are of interest to the journal.
The method and results are interesting and provide insights to fluvial systems. An issue that needs to be better addressed is that of the relevance of scale of the experiments and the relevance to the real world scale. This needs to be better discussed both in the discussion as well as the Conclusion.
It is also not clear what is meant by the suggestion of diffusion - 'Higher rainfall rates
(70 mm h-1 149 in this work) tend to inhibit the development of a channelized and branching channel
150 network in favor of more diffusive and mass wasting processes. This trend can be deduced by analyzing
151 the DEMs of mod1070 and mod1570 (Fig. S2), or simply by noting the diffuse nature of erosion under
152 high rainfall conditions (Fig. S3)'It is not clear what diffusion occurs as the raindrops are small
Please explain why such a large rainfall range was used and how this scales to real world application
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-911-EC1 -
AC1: 'Response to all Reviewers' comments and suggestions on egusphere-2022-911', Riccardo Reitano, 22 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-911/egusphere-2022-911-AC1-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Error in fig. 05 on egusphere-2022-911', Riccardo Reitano, 24 May 2023
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-911', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Dec 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-911/egusphere-2022-911-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-911', Greg Hancock, 29 Mar 2023
Dear Authors,
The paper presents the results of some detailed experimental studies at the laboratory scale. The topic and results are of interest to the journal.
The method and results are interesting and provide insights to fluvial systems. An issue that needs to be better addressed is that of the relevance of scale of the experiments and the relevance to the real world scale. This needs to be better discussed both in the discussion as well as the Conclusion.
It is also not clear what is meant by the suggestion of diffusion - 'Higher rainfall rates
(70 mm h-1 149 in this work) tend to inhibit the development of a channelized and branching channel
150 network in favor of more diffusive and mass wasting processes. This trend can be deduced by analyzing
151 the DEMs of mod1070 and mod1570 (Fig. S2), or simply by noting the diffuse nature of erosion under
152 high rainfall conditions (Fig. S3)'It is not clear what diffusion occurs as the raindrops are small
Please explain why such a large rainfall range was used and how this scales to real world application
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-911-EC1 -
AC1: 'Response to all Reviewers' comments and suggestions on egusphere-2022-911', Riccardo Reitano, 22 May 2023
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-911/egusphere-2022-911-AC1-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Error in fig. 05 on egusphere-2022-911', Riccardo Reitano, 24 May 2023
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Data sets
Raw data (pictures, DEMs, .mat files) about analogue landscapes evolution Reitano, Riccardo; Clementucci, Romano; Conrad, Ethan M.; Corbi, Fabio; Lanari, Riccardo; Faccenna, Claudio; Bazzucchi, Chiara https://dataservices.gfz-potsdam.de/panmetaworks/review/08e477e94c543368eec875408be0db5a4e08ff87ac66f5f03736fcd976b96ac0/
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
372 | 174 | 19 | 565 | 53 | 4 | 5 |
- HTML: 372
- PDF: 174
- XML: 19
- Total: 565
- Supplement: 53
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Romano Clementucci
Ethan Mark Conrad
Fabio Corbi
Riccardo Lanari
Claudio Faccenna
Chiara Bazzucchi
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1015 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(953 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper