the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Declining, seasonal-varying emissions of sulfur hexafluoride from the United States point to a new mitigation opportunity
Abstract. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is the most potent greenhouse gas and its atmospheric abundance, albeit small, has been increasing rapidly. Although SF6 is used to assess atmospheric transport modeling and influences the climate for millennia, SF6 emission magnitudes and distributions have substantial uncertainties. In this study, we used NOAA’s ground-based and airborne measurements of SF6 to estimate SF6 emissions from the U.S. between 2007 and 2018. The substantial decline in U.S. SF6 emissions derived from atmospheric observations agrees with the reported trend in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s national inventory submitted under the United Nations Framework on Climate Change, suggesting mitigation efforts have had some success. However, the magnitudes of derived annual emissions are 40–250 % higher than the EPA national inventory and substantially lower than the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research inventory. The regional discrepancies between atmosphere-based estimate and EPA’s inventory suggest that emissions from electric power transmission and distribution (ETD) facilities and an SF6 production plant that did not or do not report to EPA may be underestimated in the national inventory. Furthermore, the atmosphere-based estimates show higher winter than summer emissions of SF6. These enhanced wintertime emissions may result from increased maintenance of ETD equipment in southern states and increased leakage through aging brittle seals in ETD in northern states in winter. These results demonstrate the success of past U.S. SF6 emission mitigations, and suggest substantial additional emission reductions might be achieved through efforts to minimize emissions during servicing or through improving sealing materials in ETD.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(854 KB)
-
Supplement
(363 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(854 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(363 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-862', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Oct 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-862/egusphere-2022-862-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-862', Ingeborg Levin, 27 Oct 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-862/egusphere-2022-862-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC1: 'Response to comments on egusphere-2022-862', Lei Hu, 30 Dec 2022
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-862', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Oct 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-862/egusphere-2022-862-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-862', Ingeborg Levin, 27 Oct 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-862/egusphere-2022-862-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC1: 'Response to comments on egusphere-2022-862', Lei Hu, 30 Dec 2022
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
413 | 146 | 12 | 571 | 29 | 3 | 6 |
- HTML: 413
- PDF: 146
- XML: 12
- Total: 571
- Supplement: 29
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Deborah Ottinger
Stephanie Bogle
Stephen Montzka
Phil DeCola
Ed Dlugokencky
Arlyn Andrews
Kirk Thoning
Colm Sweeney
Geoff Dutton
Lauren Aepli
Andrew Crotwell
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(854 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(363 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper