Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-810
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-810
 
04 Oct 2022
04 Oct 2022
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Quantifying gender gaps in seismology authorship

Laura Anna Ermert1,, Maria Koroni1,, and Naiara Korta Martiartu2, Laura Anna Ermert et al.
  • 1Swiss Seismological Service, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 2Institute for Applied Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract. According to 2018 demographic data of the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, seismology is among the Geoscience fields with the lowest female representation. To understand whether this reflects seismology more generally, we investigate female authorship of peer-reviewed publications, a key factor in career advancement. Building upon open-source tools for web-scraping, we create a database of bibliographic information for seismological articles published in 14 international journals from 2010 to 2020. We use the probabilities of author names being either male or female-gendered to analyse the representation of female authors in terms of author position and subsequently per journal, year, and publication productivity. The results indicate that: 1) The overall probability of the first (last) author being female is 0.28 (0.19); 2) With the calculated rate of increase from 2010 to 2020, equal probabilities of female and male authorship would be reached towards the end of the century; 3) Compared to the overall probability of male authorship (0.76), single-authored papers in our database are disproportionately published by male authors (with probability 0.83); 4) Female representation decreases among highly productive authors; 5) Rather than being random, the composition of authorship appears to be influenced by gender: Firstly, all-male author teams are more common than what would be expected if teams were composed randomly. Secondly, the probability that first or co-authors are female increases when the last author is female, but first female authors have a low probability of working with female co-authors.

Laura Anna Ermert et al.

Status: open (until 07 Jan 2023)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-810', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Oct 2022 reply
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-810', Benjamin Fernando, 09 Nov 2022 reply

Laura Anna Ermert et al.

Laura Anna Ermert et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 517 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
386 120 11 517 27 6 1
  • HTML: 386
  • PDF: 120
  • XML: 11
  • Total: 517
  • Supplement: 27
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Oct 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Oct 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 509 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 509 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Dec 2022
Download
Short summary
We investigated gender and authorship in seismology by analyzing author names of peer-reviewed articles. Seismology continues to be a male-dominated field, although the representation of female authors has been increasing from 2010 to 2020. Gender gaps appear for single authors, authors in high-impact journals, and highly productive authors. We hope to draw the attention of the seismological community to these issues and motivate leaders in the field to take action in order to support diversity.