Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-532
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-532
 
29 Aug 2022
29 Aug 2022

Assessing and mitigating the radar – radar interference in the German C-band weather radar network

Michael Frech1, Cornelius Hald1, Maximilian Schaper1, Bertram Lange2, and Benjamin Rohrdantz2 Michael Frech et al.
  • 1Deutscher Wetterdienst, Observatorium Hohenpeißenberg, Albin-Schwaiger-Weg 10, 82383 Hohenpeißenberg
  • 2Deutscher Wetterdienst, Sasel

Abstract. The national German weather radar network operates in C-band between 5.6 and 5.65 GHZ. In a radar network, individual transmit frequencies have to be chosen such that radar-radar induced interferences are avoided. In an unique experiment the Hohenpeissenberg research radar and five operational systems from the radar network were used to characterize radar-radar induced interferences as a function of the radar frequency. The results allow to assess the possibility to add additional C-band radars with magnetron transmitters into the existing network. Based on the experiment, at least a 15 MHz separation of the nominal radar frequency is needed to avoid a radar-radar interference. The most efficient mitigation of radar-radar interference is achieved by the "Radar Tango". Latter refers to the synchronized scanning of all radar systems in the network. Based on those results, additional C-band radar systems can be added to the German weather radar network if a further improvement of the radar coverage is needed.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

20 Jan 2023
Assessing and mitigating the radar–radar interference in the German C-band weather radar network
Michael Frech, Cornelius Hald, Maximilian Schaper, Bertram Lange, and Benjamin Rohrdantz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 295–309, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-295-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-295-2023, 2023
Short summary

Michael Frech et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-532', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Oct 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Michael Frech, 01 Dec 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-532', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Nov 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Michael Frech, 01 Dec 2022

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-532', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Oct 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Michael Frech, 01 Dec 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-532', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Nov 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Michael Frech, 01 Dec 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Michael Frech on behalf of the Authors (16 Dec 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (19 Dec 2022) by Gianfranco Vulpiani

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

20 Jan 2023
Assessing and mitigating the radar–radar interference in the German C-band weather radar network
Michael Frech, Cornelius Hald, Maximilian Schaper, Bertram Lange, and Benjamin Rohrdantz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 295–309, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-295-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-295-2023, 2023
Short summary

Michael Frech et al.

Michael Frech et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 287 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
170 108 9 287 4 3
  • HTML: 170
  • PDF: 108
  • XML: 9
  • Total: 287
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Aug 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Aug 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 292 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 292 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Jan 2023
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Weather radar data are the backbone of a lot of meteorological products. In order to obtain a better low level coverage with radar data, additional systems have to be included. The frequency range in which radars are allowed to operate is limited. A potential radar to radar interference has to be avoided. The paper derives guidelines how additional radars can be included into a weather radar network and how interferences can be avoided.