the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Air-sea gas exchange in a seagrass ecosystem
Abstract. Seagrass meadows are one of the most productive ecosystems in the world and could play a role in mitigating the increase of atmospheric CO2 from human activities. Understanding their role in the global carbon cycle requires knowledge of air-sea CO2 fluxes and hence knowledge of the gas transfer velocity. In this study, gas transfer velocity and its controlling processes were examined in a seagrass ecosystem in south Florida. Gas transfer velocity was determined using the 3He and SF6 dual tracer technique in Florida Bay near Bob Allen Keys (25.02663° N, 80.68137° W) between 3 and 8 April 2015. The observed gas transfer velocity normalized for CO2 in freshwater at 20 °C, k(600), was 4.8 ± 1.8 cm h-1. The result gas transfer velocities were lower than previous experiments in the coastal and open oceans at the same wind speeds. Therefore, using published wind speed/gas exchange parameterizations would overpredict gas transfer velocities and CO2 fluxes in this area. The deviation in k(600) from other settings was weakly correlated to tidal motion and air-sea temperature difference, implying that wind is the dominant factor driving gas exchange. The lower gas transfer velocity was most likely due to wave attenuation by seagrass and limited wind fetch in this area. A new wind speed/gas exchange parameterization is proposed (k(600)=0.125u102), which might be applicable to other seagrass ecosystems and wind fetch limited environments.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(867 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(867 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-525', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Aug 2022
This is a very nice work and it brings us closer to understanding even more about the air-water CO2 exchange. My only comment/quiestion is, have you consider having longer measurment periods? As I see, there's only a couple of days available. What are the assumptions your are implying in the study if you only calculate transfer velocity for a couple of days? Can it be possible to have a longer period or different sampling periods during the year so you can implement seagrass phenology in the study design?
Other than that I belive this is great work, congrats! :)Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-525-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ryo Dobashi, 26 Oct 2022
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-525 (RC2)', Pierre Polsenaere, 29 Aug 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-525/egusphere-2022-525-CC1-supplement.pdf
- AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Ryo Dobashi, 26 Oct 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-525 (RC2)', Pierre Polsenaere, 31 Aug 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-525/egusphere-2022-525-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ryo Dobashi, 26 Oct 2022
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-525', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Aug 2022
This is a very nice work and it brings us closer to understanding even more about the air-water CO2 exchange. My only comment/quiestion is, have you consider having longer measurment periods? As I see, there's only a couple of days available. What are the assumptions your are implying in the study if you only calculate transfer velocity for a couple of days? Can it be possible to have a longer period or different sampling periods during the year so you can implement seagrass phenology in the study design?
Other than that I belive this is great work, congrats! :)Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-525-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ryo Dobashi, 26 Oct 2022
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-525 (RC2)', Pierre Polsenaere, 29 Aug 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-525/egusphere-2022-525-CC1-supplement.pdf
- AC3: 'Reply on CC1', Ryo Dobashi, 26 Oct 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-525 (RC2)', Pierre Polsenaere, 31 Aug 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2022/egusphere-2022-525/egusphere-2022-525-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ryo Dobashi, 26 Oct 2022
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Data sets
Tracer_release_experiment_Florida_bay Ryo Dobashi https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6730934
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
440 | 175 | 27 | 642 | 7 | 15 |
- HTML: 440
- PDF: 175
- XML: 27
- Total: 642
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
David T. Ho
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(867 KB) - Metadata XML