Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-43
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-43
 
17 Mar 2022
17 Mar 2022

Quantification of post-glacier erosion in the European Alps using 10Be and OSL exposure dating

Joanne Elkadi1, Benjamin Lehmann2, Georgina King1, Olivia Steinemann3, Susan Ivy-Ochs3, Marcus Christl3, and Frederic Herman1 Joanne Elkadi et al.
  • 1Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 2INSTAAR and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
  • 3Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH Zürich, Otto-Stern-Weg 5, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland

Abstract. The retreat of glaciers since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) in the European Alps has left an imprint on topography through glacial and non-glacial erosional processes. However, few methods are currently capable of resolving these mechanisms on Lateglacial to Holocene timescales. Quantifying the relative contributions of mountain erosion, during these different climate cycles, is useful for understanding long-term landscape evolution and the links between global climate and erosion. Here, we combine three Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) exposure dating signals with 10Be surface exposure dating to constrain the post-glacier erosion rates of bedrock samples down a vertical transect adjacent to the Gorner glacier in Zermatt, Switzerland. The results reveal erosion rates on the order of 10-2 to 10-1 mm a-1, in general agreement with other studies in the region, as well as a strong negative correlation between erosion rates and elevation. Finally, at present glacial erosion is assumed to have a greater influence on landscapes, yet a global compilation of both glacial and non-glacial erosion rates in deglaciated environments shows that erosion rates during interglacial times could be equally important.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

19 Sep 2022
Quantification of post-glacier bedrock surface erosion in the European Alps using 10Be and optically stimulated luminescence exposure dating
Joanne Elkadi, Benjamin Lehmann, Georgina E. King, Olivia Steinemann, Susan Ivy-Ochs, Marcus Christl, and Frédéric Herman
Earth Surf. Dynam., 10, 909–928, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-909-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-909-2022, 2022
Short summary

Joanne Elkadi et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-43', Nicolas Young, 28 Mar 2022
    • AC4: 'Reply on CC1', Joanne Elkadi, 12 Jul 2022
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-43', Derek Fabel, 16 Apr 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Joanne Elkadi, 12 Jul 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-43', Pierre Valla, 02 May 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Joanne Elkadi, 12 Jul 2022
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-43', Rachel Smedley, 03 May 2022
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Joanne Elkadi, 12 Jul 2022

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-43', Nicolas Young, 28 Mar 2022
    • AC4: 'Reply on CC1', Joanne Elkadi, 12 Jul 2022
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-43', Derek Fabel, 16 Apr 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Joanne Elkadi, 12 Jul 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-43', Pierre Valla, 02 May 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Joanne Elkadi, 12 Jul 2022
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-43', Rachel Smedley, 03 May 2022
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Joanne Elkadi, 12 Jul 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Joanne Elkadi on behalf of the Authors (13 Jul 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (20 Jul 2022) by Arjen Stroeven
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (20 Jul 2022) by Andreas Lang(Editor)

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

19 Sep 2022
Quantification of post-glacier bedrock surface erosion in the European Alps using 10Be and optically stimulated luminescence exposure dating
Joanne Elkadi, Benjamin Lehmann, Georgina E. King, Olivia Steinemann, Susan Ivy-Ochs, Marcus Christl, and Frédéric Herman
Earth Surf. Dynam., 10, 909–928, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-909-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-909-2022, 2022
Short summary

Joanne Elkadi et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 718 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
499 190 29 718 36 8 8
  • HTML: 499
  • PDF: 190
  • XML: 29
  • Total: 718
  • Supplement: 36
  • BibTeX: 8
  • EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Mar 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 652 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 652 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 19 Sep 2022
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Glacial and non-glacial processes have left a strong imprint on the landscape of the European Alps, but further research is needed to better understand their long-term effects. We apply a new technique combining two methods for bedrock surface dating to calculate post-glacier erosion rates next to a Swiss glacier. Interestingly, the results suggest that glacial and non-glacial erosion rates are more similar than previously thought.