Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-407
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-407
 
23 Jun 2022
23 Jun 2022

Are dense networks of low-cost nodes better at monitoring air pollution? A case study in Staffordshire

Louise Bøge Frederickson1,2,3, Ruta Sidaraviciute3, Johan Albrecht Schmidt3, Ole Hertel5, and Matthew Stanley Johnson3,4 Louise Bøge Frederickson et al.
  • 1Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
  • 2Danish Big Data Centre for Environment and Health (BERTHA), Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
  • 3AirLabs Denmark, Nannasgade 28, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
  • 4Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
  • 5Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark

Abstract. Air pollution exhibits hyper-local variation, especially near emissions sources. In addition to people's time-activity patterns, this variation is the most critical element determining exposure. Pollution exposure is time-activity and path-dependent with specific behaviors such as mode of commuting and time spent near a roadway or in a park playing a decisive role. Compared to conventional air pollution monitoring stations, nodes containing low-cost air pollution sensors can be deployed with very high density. Monitoring stations are often tasked with characterizing regional air pollution and are therefore placed away from local sources, leaving the additional burden of local emissions such as traffic uncharacterized. In this study, a network of 18 nodes using low-cost air pollution sensors was deployed in Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, UK, in June 2020. Each node measured a range of species including nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3) and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10); this study focuses on NO2 and PM2.5 over a one year period from August 1, 2020 to October 1, 2021. A simple and effective temperature, scale and offset correction was able to overcome data quality issues associated with temperature bias in the NO2 readings. In its recent update, the World Health Organization dramatically reduced annual exposure limit values from 40 to 10 μg m-3 for NO2 and from 10 to 5 μg m-3 for PM2.5. We found the average annual mean NO2 concentration for the network was 17.5 μg m-3, and 8.1 μg m-3 for PM2.5. While in exceedance of the WHO guideline levels, these average concentrations do not exceed legally binding UK/EU standards. The network average NO2 concentration was 12.5 μg m-3 higher than values reported by a nearby regional air quality monitoring station, showing the critical importance of monitoring close to sources before pollution is diluted. We demonstrate how data from a low-cost air pollution sensor network can reveal insights into patterns of air pollution and help determine whether sources are local or non-local. With spectral analysis, we investigate the variation of the pollution levels and identify typical periodicities. Both NO2 and PM2.5 have contributions from high-frequency sources, however, the low-frequency sources are significantly different. Using spectral analysis, we determine that at least 54.3 ± 4.3 % of NO2 is from local sources, whereas in contrast, only 37.9 ± 3.5 % of PM2.5 is local.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

01 Nov 2022
Are dense networks of low-cost nodes really useful for monitoring air pollution? A case study in Staffordshire
Louise Bøge Frederickson, Ruta Sidaraviciute, Johan Albrecht Schmidt, Ole Hertel, and Matthew Stanley Johnson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13949–13965, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13949-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13949-2022, 2022
Short summary

Louise Bøge Frederickson et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-407', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Jul 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Matthew Johnson, 02 Oct 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-407', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Jul 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Matthew Johnson, 02 Oct 2022

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-407', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Jul 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Matthew Johnson, 02 Oct 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-407', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Jul 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Matthew Johnson, 02 Oct 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Matthew Johnson on behalf of the Authors (02 Oct 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (07 Oct 2022) by Tanja Schuck
AR by Matthew Johnson on behalf of the Authors (15 Oct 2022)  Author's response    Manuscript

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

01 Nov 2022
Are dense networks of low-cost nodes really useful for monitoring air pollution? A case study in Staffordshire
Louise Bøge Frederickson, Ruta Sidaraviciute, Johan Albrecht Schmidt, Ole Hertel, and Matthew Stanley Johnson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13949–13965, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13949-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13949-2022, 2022
Short summary

Louise Bøge Frederickson et al.

Louise Bøge Frederickson et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 628 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
398 219 11 628 5 3
  • HTML: 398
  • PDF: 219
  • XML: 11
  • Total: 628
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 554 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 554 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 01 Nov 2022
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Low cost sensors see additional pollution that is not seen with traditional regional air quality monitoring stations. This additional local pollution is sufficient to cause exceedance of the World Health Organization exposure thresholds. Analysis shows that a significant amount of the NO2 pollution we observe is local, mainly due to road traffic. This article demonstrates how networks of nodes containing low cost pollution sensors can powerfully extend existing monitoring programs.