the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Detecting micro fractures: A comprehensive comparison of conventional and machine-learning based segmentation methods
Abstract. Studying porous rocks with X-Ray Computed Tomography (XRCT) has been established as a standard procedure for the non-destructive characterization of flow and transport in porous media. Despite the recent advances in the field of XRCT, various challenges still remain due to the inherent noise and imaging artefacts in the produced data. These issues become even more profound when the objective is the identification of fractures, and/or fracture networks. One challenge is the limited contrast between the regions of interest and the neighboring areas, which can mostly be attributed to the minute aperture of the fractures. In order to overcome this challenge, it has been a common approach to apply various digital image processing steps, such as filtering, to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio. Additionally, segmentation methods based on threshold/morphology schemes have been employed to obtain enhanced information from the features of interest. However, this workflow needs a skillful operator to fine-tune its input parameters, and the required computation time significantly increases due to the complexity of the available methods, and the large volume of an XRCT data-set. In this study, based on a data-set produced by the successful visualization of a fracture network in Carrara marble with μXRCT, we present the results from five segmentation methods, three conventional and two machine learning-based ones. The objective is to provide the interested reader with a comprehensive comparison between existing approaches, while presenting the operating principles, advantages and limitations, to serve as a guide towards an individualized segmentation workflow. The segmentation results from all five methods are compared to each other in terms of quality and time efficiency. Due to memory limitations, and in order to accomplish a fair comparison, all the methods are employed in a 2D scheme. The output of the 2D U-net model, which is one of the adopted machine learning-based segmentation methods, shows the best performance regarding the quality of segmentation and the required processing time.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(0 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-400', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Jul 2022
Dear authors,
I much enjoyed reading your paper, which was well-written and presented. Please find my review, attached.
Best regards,
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Dongwon Lee, 08 Aug 2022
Dear Reviewer,
We would like to thank you very much for your insightful comments. We believe that after the review process our article has significantly improved.
We trust that we have adequately addressed your comments/remarks/concerns in the revised article. We believe that after having performed the necessary improvements, the article can be considered for publication with the journal.
Once again, thank you very much for your assistance in total.
Sincerely yours,
Dongwon Lee, Nikolaos Karadimitriou, Matthias Ruf & Holger Steeb.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Dongwon Lee, 08 Aug 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-400', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Jul 2022
Dear editor/authors,
I have found this work highly relevant, well-written and structured. Therefore, I would like to recommend it for publication. Please find attached some minor commets.
Kind regards.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Dongwon Lee, 08 Aug 2022
Dear Reviewer,
We would like to thank you very much for your insightful comments. We believe that after the review process our article has significantly improved.
We trust that we have adequately addressed your comments/remarks/concerns in the revised article. We believe that after having performed the necessary improvements, the article can be considered for publication with the journal.
Once again, thank you very much for your assistance in total.
Sincerely yours,
Dongwon Lee, Nikolaos Karadimitriou, Matthias Ruf & Holger Steeb.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Dongwon Lee, 08 Aug 2022
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-400', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Jul 2022
Dear authors,
I much enjoyed reading your paper, which was well-written and presented. Please find my review, attached.
Best regards,
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Dongwon Lee, 08 Aug 2022
Dear Reviewer,
We would like to thank you very much for your insightful comments. We believe that after the review process our article has significantly improved.
We trust that we have adequately addressed your comments/remarks/concerns in the revised article. We believe that after having performed the necessary improvements, the article can be considered for publication with the journal.
Once again, thank you very much for your assistance in total.
Sincerely yours,
Dongwon Lee, Nikolaos Karadimitriou, Matthias Ruf & Holger Steeb.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Dongwon Lee, 08 Aug 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-400', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Jul 2022
Dear editor/authors,
I have found this work highly relevant, well-written and structured. Therefore, I would like to recommend it for publication. Please find attached some minor commets.
Kind regards.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Dongwon Lee, 08 Aug 2022
Dear Reviewer,
We would like to thank you very much for your insightful comments. We believe that after the review process our article has significantly improved.
We trust that we have adequately addressed your comments/remarks/concerns in the revised article. We believe that after having performed the necessary improvements, the article can be considered for publication with the journal.
Once again, thank you very much for your assistance in total.
Sincerely yours,
Dongwon Lee, Nikolaos Karadimitriou, Matthias Ruf & Holger Steeb.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Dongwon Lee, 08 Aug 2022
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Data sets
micro-XRCT data set of Carrara marble with artificially created crack network: fast cooling down from 600°C Matthias Ruf;Holger Steeb https://doi.org/10.18419/darus-682
Model code and software
Fracture network segmentation Dongwon Lee;Nikolaos Karadimitriou;Holger Steeb https://doi.org/10.18419/darus-1847
Viewed
Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
177 | 0 | 0 | 177 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 177
- PDF: 0
- XML: 0
- Total: 177
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dongwon Lee
Nikolaos Karadimitriou
Matthias Ruf
Holger Steeb
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.