Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-266
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-266
 
17 May 2022
17 May 2022

Sensitivity of modeled snow grain size retrievals to solar geometry, snow particle asphericity, and snowpack impurities

Zachary Fair1, Mark Flanner1, Adam Schneider2, and S. McKenzie Skiles3 Zachary Fair et al.
  • 1Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • 2Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA
  • 3Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Abstract. Snow grain size is an important metric to determine snow age and metamorphism, but it is difficult to measure. The effective grain size can be derived from spaceborne and airborne radiance measurements due to strong attenuation of near-infrared energy by ice. Consequently, a snow grain size inversion technique that uses hyperspectral radiances and exploits variations in the 1.03 μm ice absorption feature was previously developed for use with airborne imaging spectroscopy. Previous studies have since demonstrated the effectiveness of the technique, though there has yet to be a quantitative assessment of the retrieval sensitivity to snowpack impurities, ice particle shape, or solar geometry. In this study, we use the Snow, Ice, and Aerosol Radiative (SNICAR) model and a Monte Carlo photon tracking model to examine the sensitivity of snow grain size retrievals to changes in dust and black carbon content, anisotropic reflectance, changes in solar illumination angle (θ0), and scattering asymmetry parameter (g) associated with different particle shapes. Our results show that changes in these variables can produce large grain size errors, especially when the effective grain size exceeds 500 μm. Dust content of 1000 ppm induces errors exceeding 800 μm, with the highest biases associated with small particles. Aspherical ice particles and perturbed solar zenith angles produce maximum biases of ∼540 μm and ∼400 μm respectively, when spherical snow grains and θ0 = 60° are assumed in the generation of the retrieval calibration curve. Retrievals become highly sensitive to viewing angle when reflectance is anisotropic, with biases exceeding 1000 μm in extreme cases. Overall, we show that a more detailed understanding of snowpack state and solar geometry improves the precision when determining snow grain size through hyperspectral remote sensing.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

22 Sep 2022
Sensitivity of modeled snow grain size retrievals to solar geometry, snow particle asphericity, and snowpack impurities
Zachary Fair, Mark Flanner, Adam Schneider, and S. McKenzie Skiles
The Cryosphere, 16, 3801–3814, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3801-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3801-2022, 2022
Short summary

Zachary Fair et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-266', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 May 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Zachary Fair, 11 Aug 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-266', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Jul 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Zachary Fair, 11 Aug 2022

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-266', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 May 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Zachary Fair, 11 Aug 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-266', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Jul 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Zachary Fair, 11 Aug 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (12 Aug 2022) by Florent Dominé
AR by Zachary Fair on behalf of the Authors (18 Aug 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (30 Aug 2022) by Florent Dominé

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

22 Sep 2022
Sensitivity of modeled snow grain size retrievals to solar geometry, snow particle asphericity, and snowpack impurities
Zachary Fair, Mark Flanner, Adam Schneider, and S. McKenzie Skiles
The Cryosphere, 16, 3801–3814, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3801-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3801-2022, 2022
Short summary

Zachary Fair et al.

Zachary Fair et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 317 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
219 85 13 317 5 7
  • HTML: 219
  • PDF: 85
  • XML: 13
  • Total: 317
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 7
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 May 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 May 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 281 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 281 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 22 Sep 2022
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Snow grain size is important to know the age and structure of snow, but it is difficult to measure. Snow grain size can be found from airborne and spaceborne observations by measuring near-infrared energy reflected from snow. In this study, we use the SNICAR radiative transfer model and a Monte Carlo model to examine how snow grain size measurements change with snow structure and solar zenith angle. We show that improved understanding of these variables improves snow grain size precision.