the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Kinematics of surface currents at the northern margin of the Gulf of Cadiz
Abstract. The subtidal surface water circulation at the northern margin of the Gulf of Cadiz, at the southern extremity of the Iberian upwelling system, is described based on validated hourly high frequency radar measurements from 2016 to 2020. Statistical analyses (mean, standard deviation, eccentricity and empirical orthogonal functions) are applied to the dataset, which is completed with ADCP time-series from multiple moorings at 5 inner-shelf stations and ERA5 wind. Off the shelf, the main circulation pattern consists of a slope current, best developed in summer when north-westerlies dominate, in particular at the most exposed western region. Other mechanisms than upwelling must contribute to this flow in order to explain its seasonal persistence. The slope circulation reverses for regional wind events with east component > 10 m.s-1, approximately. On the shelf, currents are mainly alongshore and balanced. The circulation is generally continuous along the coast, except for weak (< 0.1 m.s-1, broadly) poleward flows. In the latter case, the flow tends to remain equatorward near Cape Santa Maria. In winter, coastal poleward flows often extend over the entire margin and are mainly wind-driven. In summer, these flows generally consist of coastal counter currents (CCCs) with poleward direction opposed to the one of the slope current. The CCCs are associated with significant cyclonic recirculation, strongest at West, where a transient eddy is shortly observed for weak wind stress. This circulation develops after periods of strong north-westerlies, supporting that CCCs result from the unbalance of a regional along-shore pressure gradient.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(4268 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(4268 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-112', Charles-Antoine GUERIN, 03 May 2022
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Luciano Júnior, 27 May 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-112', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 May 2022
Main comment:
The description of the general circulation of the northern area of the Gulf of Cadiz has been described based on data from the cross-border radar network in Spain and Portugal. The study is well founded, various methodologies have been applied and the analysis of the results reaches conclusions consistent with the literature. I strongly recommend the publication of the paper.
Minor comments:
- The surface current velocity is not the same for drifters, ADCPs and HF radars. Considering also that the surface boundary layer varies greatly in the first meters, which water parcel is measured by each instrument must be described, as well as an explanation of the possible discrepancies between one method of measurement and another.
- The drifters measurements do not provide much information to the study even in the validation phase. I would advise removing them from it.
- The text alludes to the low eccentricity of the STD ellipses when the radars are aligned. However, very close to the coast, the high eccentricity is recovered despite continuing with a high GDOP. Any explanation?
Typos:
Line 260, ‘... of low eccentricity' must say ‘high eccentricity'.
Figure 7, caption: ‘...temporal modes 1 (b: amplitude, c: phase)’ must say ‘(c: amplitude, d: phase)’.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-112-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Luciano Júnior, 27 May 2022
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-112', Charles-Antoine GUERIN, 03 May 2022
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Luciano Júnior, 27 May 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-112', Anonymous Referee #2, 10 May 2022
Main comment:
The description of the general circulation of the northern area of the Gulf of Cadiz has been described based on data from the cross-border radar network in Spain and Portugal. The study is well founded, various methodologies have been applied and the analysis of the results reaches conclusions consistent with the literature. I strongly recommend the publication of the paper.
Minor comments:
- The surface current velocity is not the same for drifters, ADCPs and HF radars. Considering also that the surface boundary layer varies greatly in the first meters, which water parcel is measured by each instrument must be described, as well as an explanation of the possible discrepancies between one method of measurement and another.
- The drifters measurements do not provide much information to the study even in the validation phase. I would advise removing them from it.
- The text alludes to the low eccentricity of the STD ellipses when the radars are aligned. However, very close to the coast, the high eccentricity is recovered despite continuing with a high GDOP. Any explanation?
Typos:
Line 260, ‘... of low eccentricity' must say ‘high eccentricity'.
Figure 7, caption: ‘...temporal modes 1 (b: amplitude, c: phase)’ must say ‘(c: amplitude, d: phase)’.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-112-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Luciano Júnior, 27 May 2022
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
180 | 49 | 5 | 234 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 180
- PDF: 49
- XML: 5
- Total: 234
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Luciano de Oliveira Júnior
Paulo Relvas
Erwan Garel
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(4268 KB) - Metadata XML