<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" specific-use="SMUR" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">EGUsphere</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>EGUsphere</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">EGUsphere</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">EGUsphere</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub"></issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/egusphere-2026-3355</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>A terrain-stratified comparison of regional MPAS-A (v8.3.1) and nested WRF (v4.7.1) for short-term near-surface wind forecasting</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yalcin</surname>
<given-names>Ruhi Deniz</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0499-0764</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yilmaz</surname>
<given-names>Mustafa Tugrul</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5094-1878</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yucel</surname>
<given-names>Ismail</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9073-9324</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sen</surname>
<given-names>Omer Lutfi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oruc</surname>
<given-names>Sertac</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Senocak</surname>
<given-names>Ali Ulvi Galip</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5644-9312</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Türkiye</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Türkiye</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<addr-line>Department of Civil Engineering, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Türkiye</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>20</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2026</volume>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>28</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2026 Ruhi Deniz Yalcin et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-3355/">This article is available from https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-3355/</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-3355/egusphere-2026-3355.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-3355/egusphere-2026-3355.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Accurate deterministic forecasts of 10 m wind over complex terrain remain challenging, and the relative performance of nested regional and variable-resolution modelling strategies is still insufficiently documented. This study presents a controlled comparison of five deterministic forecast products over T&amp;uuml;rkiye: four nested WRF configurations at 12 km parent and 4 km child domain resolution with one-way and two-way nesting, and regional MPAS-Atmosphere with an approximately 4 km refined inner region. All experiments use identical 0.25&amp;deg; GFS forcing, are initialised daily at 00:00 UTC, and integrated for 48 h. After excluding the first 6 h as spin-up, verification is performed over lead times 6&amp;ndash;47 h using 10 m wind speed observations from 509 TSMS stations during January and June 2023. Terrain effects are explicitly addressed through a Terrain Ruggedness Index computed from SRTM GL3 elevation data and a three-class terrain stratification. Model performance is assessed using mean error, mean absolute error, root mean square error, and Pearson correlation coefficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MPAS achieves the lowest error across all aggregate metrics, with ME of 0.76 m s&amp;minus;1 and RMSE of 2.16 m s&amp;minus;1, compared to 0.99 m s&amp;minus;1 and 2.27 m s&amp;minus;1 for the best WRF configuration. All models exhibit systematic positive bias. The performance gap between MPAS and WRF is strongly terrain-dependent: negligible in low-complexity terrain but reaching 41 % ME reduction at high-complexity sites. Increasing WRF resolution from 12 km to 4 km does not consistently reduce bias, with the coarser 12 km two-way configuration outperforming the finer 4 km two-way configuration across both months and all terrain classes, pointing to grey-zone boundary layer limitations and lateral boundary constraints. Two-way nesting provides meaningful improvement at 12 km but offers diminishing returns at 4 km. MPAS&amp;rsquo;s aggregate ME advantage partly reflects a compensating bias structure: reduced overprediction at calm and moderate wind speeds is offset by stronger underprediction at high wind speeds, reaching ME of &amp;minus;3.28 m s&amp;minus;1 at high-complexity sites. This wind speed dependence also explains the spatial reversal along the Aegean coast, where WRF 4 km configuration outperforms MPAS at 70 % of stations. These results indicate that neither modelling approach offers a universal advantage; relative performance depends on terrain complexity, local wind climate, and the verification metric of interest.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="28"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>