<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" specific-use="SMUR" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">EGUsphere</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>EGUsphere</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">EGUsphere</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">EGUsphere</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub"></issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/egusphere-2025-3749</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>CYCLIM: a semi-automated cycle counting tool for palaeoclimate reconstruction</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Forman</surname>
<given-names>Edward Christopher Grant</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Baldini</surname>
<given-names>James Ugo Lee</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Department of Earth Sciences, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2025</volume>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>20</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2025 Edward Christopher Grant Forman</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3749/">This article is available from https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3749/</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3749/egusphere-2025-3749.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-3749/egusphere-2025-3749.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Counting annual-scale fluctuations, such as geochemical cyclicity or visible growth bands, within a climate archive can yield extremely high-precision chronological models. However, this process is often time-consuming and subjective, and although various software packages can automate this process, many researchers still prefer to count manually given its technical simplicity and transparency. Here we present a new tool that combines the time saved by automation with the flexibility afforded by expert judgement. CYCLIM uses a matched filtering approach to detect cyclicity and then allows the user to inspect and refine the automated output whilst also quantifying age uncertainty. The presented framework speeds up cycle counting by automating the first-pass of the count while also retaining the benefits of a manual count by allowing for post-analysis tuning. Across three examples using published palaeoclimate reconstructions, the automatic output found 96.2 % of the cycles, with a false positive and false negative rate of 3.3 % and 3.8 %, respectively. This means that only 7 cycles per 100 need to be corrected manually, making cycle counting with CYCLIM ~14.1 times faster.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="20"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>